@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck Think they used it on Epstein?

Why tho

they could just get rid of him and no info about high-up pedos would get out

If one wants to get ahold of a sargon for a discussion, how would one do so? jw

I've tried.

I've even buttered up his @Secretary of Akkad. No luck.

If America is majority brown by the end of the century it won't be the USA anymore.
Their union will be destroyed.
I'll be surprised how long America will actually last for.
It'll be interesting to see how it goes once Trump leaves office. Like that inevitability will be the catalyst.

How will it not be the US? I'd love to know how race has the ability to change a nation.

That's one thing, the US' grand experiment is not predicated by race - it is by a baseline credo. Associating race and credo is actually fairly anti-American, bluntly. These things are not inherently tied.

One could easily claim the counter about Europe and much of the rest of the world, but fundamentally race is a marked irrelevancy for the States.

entirely and completely wrong

The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were "free White persons of good character". It thus excluded Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians, although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in certain states. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children "shall be considered as natural born citizens," the only US statute ever to use the term. It specified that the right of citizenship did "not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States."[1][2][3]

The american experiment was to create a neoengland

or western europe

@Mikey Look up the definition of nation 🤣

"Common Descent"

"Common descent, history, culture OR language"

It can be any of those.

It's not required to be all.

Cope

I'm sure the North American indian PEOPLE delineate on common culture boss

Yeah, I'm sure they do

You definitely dont need any blood element

Thats like a quack idea!

Ergo no genocide of the Natives occurred they just transmuted into a different people via the musket

Tldr: A group of people connected through one or more things

You can keep trying to obfuscate

>Gets another definition when the first one he provides doesn't support his argument

> Theres only one definition for words

Your brain on big brained individualism

http://thinkaboutnow.com/2017/12/avoiding-arguing-bad-faith/

Now he links so called philosophical fallacies because hes fallen short

>"I attack people because I argue in bad faith"

At this stage of time, however, it is *culture* and *not* race that defines the United States- it is you that are completely incorrect.

Though it *began* as such, the evolutionary processes built into the selfsame Constitution permitted Amendments to *extend* the privileges of Citizenship beyond then originally defined scope.

Additionally, that particular statute is a *law* rather than a pretense of the underlying philosophical implications of the Experiment.

*Furthermore*, both elements utilize the idea of culture in different word choices- the former overtly and the latter in description. "[...]government, language, traditions, etc[...]"

*Finally*, at the root source of your original argument, I leave a question: what is the overruling and fundamental law of the land in the US?