Which you now complain about.

Its a problem of Free Markets of course, I don't support Laissez Faire Capitalism i do believe that there should be some restrictions on companies that have monopiles

Communist.

I am not even close to being a Communist although i used to be

Feudalism is the way forward

No

Just no

Even Adam Smith opposed Monopolies and he was a very important figure in the creation of Capitalism

TWITTER LOCKS ACCOUNTS DEMANDING VOTER ID FOR 2020 ELECTIONS
> https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/08/twitter-locks-accounts-for-demanding-voter-id-for-2020-elections/90184/
~ <https://twitter.com/OneAngryGamerHD/status/1157811016165658626>

Daily reminder that Adam Smith was 1st and foremost a moral philosopher and believed that man was naturally imbued with a instinct towards the good and this is what his economic writings were based upon. This being obviously just bollocks and a fad of the time, there is not rational justification for taking Adam Smith's reasoning as a serious, and even less so a valid one.

get rekt, Liberal

Its just one example though, Monopolies are not a good thing they don't really provide any benefit to society

I would consider myself to be a right leaning minor libertarian, Not a Liberal

Agreed, we should abolish the State, the ultimate monopoly on violence

dab

We shouldn't Abolish the State

But you said monopolies were bad

They are, And the State can deal with it, However if the State did not interfere in the market at all it would be more difficult for Monopolies to develop

But the state IS a monopoly

At least the Liberal state

If we could reset the economy a Minarchist State would likely work best

the feudal state wasn't

However because the state has already interfered with the economy if this was done now it would only increase the power of monopiles

I feel like ur just reciting talking points and not tackling the issue of the state itself being a monopoly

The State may have a monopoly on violence but that is necessary, I don't like it but i is necessary

Sup Doom, lit name change

sup, antisemite

For example what if someone steals something and refused to give it back, How does the owner of it get it back without calling on the state to inflict violence on the thief?

You could have a decentralized state

with local power structures

"Facebook in Czechia deletes people's posts that mention Tommy Robinson, outrageous say experts" (Google Translate is pretty decent from the quick check I made): https://zpravy.aktualne.cz/domaci/facebook-maze-prispevky-se-jmenem-tommyho-robinsona/r~f17b1a44b50211e989de0cc47ab5f122/

You would still end up with a central power albeit a smaller central power but a central power nonetheless with a monopoly on violence

They didn't have that before the Enlightenment

In order to have any semblance of order the state needs to have the power to inflict violence

you had local lords

over whom the king only had limited power

and they would be the arbiters of things local

And those local lords had a monopoly on the use of violence in their county

The monopoly of violence is not removed it is just spread to local areas

depends

You are just moving the monopoly around, You are not actually removing it