Message from @Miniature Menace
Discord ID: 614653842939707393
Same.
It implies you have an objective in mind.
Yeah, well, evolution doesn't work that way.
@Miniature Menace I am rather annoyed with myself that I'm not able to dedicate the proper amount of time to theis conversation ¬.¬
Fucking vegetables is actually part of the moral matrix testing Haidt used......
Evolution sans conscious intent, yes. It does not work that way. Nevertheless, selection can, and does. We've been breeding both beasts, and humans, based on human priorities, for a very long time.
Kek.
And both to considerable effect.
Yeah that's not how evolution works at all.
Evolution is just what survives.
"We've been breeding humans"
<:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>
Kek.
MM, all it takes is one person to demonstrate the absurdity of your positions, and your rhetorical house of cards comes crashing down.
Demonstrate this.
Read the chat, you fucking lemon.
Most of this isn't actually an argument against my point. It's just an insistence that I address your questions on your terms, based on your erroneous assumptions.
You answered no one's questions.
You replied to a request for an alternative to democracy with absolute woo.
No. It's the goofy shit you say. And that when asked to back any of it up you just say new and different goofy shit.
Indeed. You're a woo merchant.
You're erroneous assumption is that in order to argue Democracy is shit, I must advocate an alternative. I don't actually need to.
You also didn't mean that democracy is shit
You seemed to be saying that you thought it was just as good as anything else
Not an argument.
I don't necessarily think it's as good as anything else. Only that it has an acute danger in that people often assume it is better.
I'm not making an argument. I'm calling out your woo.
its better than any known alternative
It's not woo. You just don't like it.
there, that was easy
Indeed, system11
"Democracy is the worst form of government. Except for all those other forms of government that have been tried." —Winston Churchill
Democracy tended to have better results not because of the system, but because the kind of populations which generally adopted it tended to be comparatively advantaged. Which was one of the reasons it was appealing. But then, the results of actually utilizing it, in the long term, have come to deteriorate the qualities of the population which made it so appealing.
Woo.
<:thunk:462282216467333140>
"X is bad" is a comparative statement that says "X is not as good as field Y's average performance"
Okay, need I step you through the process?
Pure democracy is shit it just means the majority can treat the minority like slaves. A constitutional republic is better.
See I can argue against democracy *and* justify why *and* suggest an alternative. Pretty easy TBH fam.
Indeed. Well said.
wait a minute - is that how democracy works? the people who won the vote are now slave owners? fucking awesome - my garden needs tidying up