Message from @Spinflight
Discord ID: 616332160164429877
It's not one or the other bud it can be more than one factor
It's written loud and clear in feminist theories of International Politics. Immigration is the prime policy of all feminists..
wow
and who originated and pushes feminism?
I blame Islam.
I blame Neo Libs
I blame Marxist and Jews
^
I blame yo mama
In fact before they allowed gender studies departments in US colleges the femininsts would set up Migration studies departments to get around the colleges policies
To campaign for immigration
so this is what happens to someone's brain when they cant move on from rekt feminist videos
You keep talking about feminist but I did say Marxist and Jews
I don't really know who has pushed feminism... Seems like lots of different types...
Where's the argument that this wasn't Ethnic Cleansing though.... That was supposed to be the debate...
Tony Blair was the most complete and powerful feminist I think... Other than that....
Was it I was address the previous comments about Islamophobia
Scroll up to about 6pm...
If the state allows one race to rape another then that is definitionally Ethnic Cleansing surely?
Sure
Yes
Of course
Entirely
The Jews did it
Seems that social workers and politicians have been up to similar tricks elsewhere though....
If only there was some ideology which connected them all....
Mere words can only do so much to describe a man like Assad. A fearless leader, he stayed in his country and fiercely fought the Atlanticist and jihadist onslaught. Put any other president in the situation Assad has been all these years, he would’ve boarded the first jet to Hawaii, but Bashar didn’t. Not only did he almost single-handedly bring the military-industrial complex to its knees, foiling the neocon’s malignant plan to divide Syria, but also defeated the great menace that is ISIS. Not just the middle east, but the entire world owes a huge debt to the Assad family. Statues of Bashar would have to spring up in every single city, every village, nook and cranny of the planet Earth, yet it still would not be enough to repay this great man for all the great things he’s done for humanity.
I should add furthermore that he is unironically right and the failed campaign in syria has broken the back of US imperialism, their plots are failing globally, their empire is collapsing, allies are deserting them, the whole world thinks they are a laughing stock, their government is at war with itself, all because of Assad. Had Syria fallen, we would be kneeling before Empress Clinton I of the Eternal Neoliberal Empire. Assad literally saved all of human civilization from a horrifying fate, literally with some TNT and barrels. @Tonight at 11 - DOOM
Based and Redpilled.
Well as to 'American Imperialism' it doesn't really exist. A bit of history here prior to WWII there was a sequestered impreial system. Various European empires controled subject states and built independent trade networks supported by national navies. After WWII America set up a convention at Bretton Woods in which they offered a better deal. One navy, the largest most powerful ever to be built, would cover **all** trade routes, everywhere. Because it was owned by the largest industrial power on the planet conveniently located between the Atlantic and Pacific. The entry cost was being on our side and letting us run the cold war.
You might notice that America does not much use this trade network. Global trade accounts for about 15% of our GDP and 2/3rds of that is Mexico and Canada. So either our colonies are incredibly poorly managed or we are not an Empire.
Next your odd notions on Assad. He can't retire. Too many people want to kill him. He is in the one place his personal safety is insured. Nor did he 'defeat' America. We did some experiments with this and we know what it would take to crush a ME military. Even if it is one of the largest on the planet. It's a few billion dollars and a couple weeks. You could say we are complete shit at nation building and I would heartily agree with you. But if we wanted to war with Syria it would be very breif and decisive (after which we would completely fumble the occupation because we really are shit at that sort of thing).
We're not so bad at occupation, really. It's the culture of the Middle East that wrecks __any__ attempts to civilize the place, especially after a major war. Islam plays the largest part, what with its compuslive need to control every tiny little thing, but beyond that, the people there do not share information and knowledge lightly, if at all. The culture Islam created in that region, kept suppressed and ignorant for 1400 years, is barbaric, and sadly it produces barbaric people.
do you think Trimps presidency is over? I mean all it would take for the demonrats would be someone that could talk sense with the CGI wire removal enabled and no puppeteer arm up their asses and he would be gone.
even the infowar gun girl was saying she doesnt support trimp no more and shes arguing with the pirate guy online
No. He's got far more winning to do. He'll win 2020 and get tons of congressional support.
What about Trump?
It's actually funny
An honest, sophisticated anti-Trump campaign would be about his countless lies
But they can't do that for two reasons
One, people are bad at nuance, or they worship Trump, either way it won't work on them.
Two, if they start talking about his lies, there will be an equally powerful counter campaign exposing their lies as well
I think this would be some sort of advanced Streisand effect
So what holes can they poke into Trump? The fact that he didn't manage to start building the wall yet (only private companies have done so) should be one, but for some reason they don't focus on that.
Maybe because of the same issue: if they reveal that he didn't start building it, people will point out that private companies have started, and with huge success
So another example of this advanced Streisand effect that I have no better term for
So they can't reveal anything that would also reveal another thing that goes against their own narrative