When I thought about it Sargon is wrong about veganism. Because it's just the same logic as pacifist, they're just a bunch of hypocrites.
Animals will be suffering and die because of human causes and needs regardless.
Be it deforestation for farm land, the mass amount of animals you'll need to euthanaise from the current farm populations. Plus if we're taking human life as animal life into the equation humans will suffer and probably starve from famines it'd cause.
Vegans are just hypocrites.
Also the Sargon bit was that he said he doesn't really have an ethical argument against veganism. Although I guess my argument doesn't mean his necessarily wrong it just means he's not thought it through enough I guess.
That or its just virtue signalling. Like if all vegans advocated for human extinction then I'd at least be able to say fair enough as i dismiss their bullshit but if you ain't willing to commit to the cause don't fucking talk to me pussy
Better thing to do is advocate for the minimisation of the suffering for farm animals.
Because basically at the end of the day someone's got to clean the toilets. And rather than saying no one should have to do that and I won't use public toilets in protest perhaps spend your time trying to make the situation of having to clean toilets more comfortable and worthwhile.
He seems to be on the culture war lynching stuff weekly, occasionally caught peddling lies. And the best he can do is detract, and roll his eyes (a subconscious hint that he's lying out of his ass, seeking answers from his peripheral vision).
