Wrong, I'm not

Then you're not against redistribution of wealth

Wrong

<:thinkcide:462282415549841409>

You need to actually read the definition properly

I know the definition, ETBrooD, and i'm also well aware that your opinion can be summed up as "Anything that isn't 100% Anarcho-capitalism is socialism"

Charity and taxes are different, one is a free choice to give your money away to others, the other is not a free choice

mhm

In one case someone else moves your money

In the other case you move your own money

so any involuntary movement of your money, you would consider redistribution?

That's what it means, yes

so voluntary distribution of wealth is not redistribution?

Correct, because you're not redistributing wealth, you're just distributing it

Redistribution of wealth specifically means that someone who's not the original owner of that wealth is doing the movement

https://twitter.com/DVATW/status/1168479686424506368?s=20

How do legal orders fit into this? Is that not redistribution?

They would be, yes

hmm

The key term is voluntary vs involuntary

Yours vs mine

That's where the saying comes from: socialists never get tired of spending other people's money

why don't we kick those Muslim invaders out already

@ETBrooD

redistribution

1. The act of changing the distribution of resources.
2. The further distribution of something received or purchased.

Now you can stop being retarded

i mean for fuck sake they just cause trouble

Where is this definition from, and what part of it is your argument?

Cant kick out citizens @tea_in_space , usually unless they have comitted treason.

but they are not culturally English and are causing to much trouble so we should just kick them out

@ETBrooD

In cultural anthropology and sociology, redistribution refers to a system of economic exchange involving the centralized collection of goods from members of a group followed by the redivision of those goods among those members.

hell take away there citizenship

And? What's your argument?

Plus, pls tell me your source

I don't have one yet, I'm simply defining terms because you're too retarded to do it.

I'm too retarded for what?

To define your fucking terms before arguing on the internet.

I understand the term "redistribution" perfectly well

like they are not culturally British and are living in parallel society's so we should simply kick them

Well, you seem to understand it differently than other people do.

hmm, I am not very comfortable with that Tea, taking citizenships is a serious thing, Was 'misused' by a certain group in the past😬

Which causes a problem.