that's the point

What point?

not all redistribution of wealth is socialism

Wrong

socialism requires redistribution of wealth to achieve equity

REdistribution of wealth is always socialism

So you're against inheritance?

It's in the word

RE-distribution

if you get paid, value is distributed

eg wealth

what is capitalism but the constant generation and redistribution of wealth

Moving wealth is not socialism. RE-distributing it is socialism.

You're against inheritance, charitable giving

Wrong, I'm not

Then you're not against redistribution of wealth

Wrong

<:thinkcide:462282415549841409>

You need to actually read the definition properly

I know the definition, ETBrooD, and i'm also well aware that your opinion can be summed up as "Anything that isn't 100% Anarcho-capitalism is socialism"

Charity and taxes are different, one is a free choice to give your money away to others, the other is not a free choice

mhm

In one case someone else moves your money

In the other case you move your own money

so any involuntary movement of your money, you would consider redistribution?

That's what it means, yes

so voluntary distribution of wealth is not redistribution?

Correct, because you're not redistributing wealth, you're just distributing it

Redistribution of wealth specifically means that someone who's not the original owner of that wealth is doing the movement

https://twitter.com/DVATW/status/1168479686424506368?s=20

How do legal orders fit into this? Is that not redistribution?

They would be, yes

hmm

The key term is voluntary vs involuntary

Yours vs mine

That's where the saying comes from: socialists never get tired of spending other people's money

why don't we kick those Muslim invaders out already

@ETBrooD

redistribution

1. The act of changing the distribution of resources.
2. The further distribution of something received or purchased.

Now you can stop being retarded

i mean for fuck sake they just cause trouble

Where is this definition from, and what part of it is your argument?