Yours vs mine

That's where the saying comes from: socialists never get tired of spending other people's money

why don't we kick those Muslim invaders out already

@ETBrooD

redistribution

1. The act of changing the distribution of resources.
2. The further distribution of something received or purchased.

Now you can stop being retarded

i mean for fuck sake they just cause trouble

Where is this definition from, and what part of it is your argument?

Cant kick out citizens @tea_in_space , usually unless they have comitted treason.

but they are not culturally English and are causing to much trouble so we should just kick them out

@ETBrooD

In cultural anthropology and sociology, redistribution refers to a system of economic exchange involving the centralized collection of goods from members of a group followed by the redivision of those goods among those members.

hell take away there citizenship

And? What's your argument?

Plus, pls tell me your source

I don't have one yet, I'm simply defining terms because you're too retarded to do it.

I'm too retarded for what?

To define your fucking terms before arguing on the internet.

I understand the term "redistribution" perfectly well

like they are not culturally British and are living in parallel society's so we should simply kick them

Well, you seem to understand it differently than other people do.

hmm, I am not very comfortable with that Tea, taking citizenships is a serious thing, Was 'misused' by a certain group in the past😬

Which causes a problem.

Then explain to me the difference and explain to me why my understanding is wrong

Which you could fix very simply if you weren't retarded.

Tell me the difference then, go ahead

I'm all for an honest discussion of terms

look they are a threat to our way of life and are living in parallel society's with different laws, etc so no they should not be here, i mean Britain is already going through a cultural crisis and the Muslims are just making it worse

The point is then that the difference doesn't even matter in the end. You're completely free to not have people take your stuff involuntarily for redistribution ... you fucking leave to a place where they don't do it.

That sounds like a different argument

If I have the definitions wrong, that's one argument, but if the definitions somehow don't matter, that's another argument

So pls pick one and tell me where I have a misunderstanding

Because it supersedes that shitflingfest I read above.

I thought definitions come first? Now they don't?

Let's start with this exchange:

@Eccles not all redistribution of wealth is socialism
@ETBrooD wrong

Exhibit A:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_economy

Two things can be true at the same time

I can be right, and a palace economy can be socialism

Socialism is an umbrella term for all systems that function the same as socialism does

cant argue with that logic😂

A monarchy for example falls under socialism

Exhibit B:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economy

good grief, is he still going?