Message from @the1j

Discord ID: 618273710154973186


2019-09-03 02:29:55 UTC  

I argued with you at length.

2019-09-03 02:29:57 UTC  

**BEHOLD, LOLI BUTTS!!!**

2019-09-03 02:30:03 UTC  

Instead you want me to go chasing your whitefu.

2019-09-03 02:30:30 UTC  

Ryan Faulk is a fag, lol

2019-09-03 02:30:36 UTC  

But he's an autistic fag.

2019-09-03 02:30:50 UTC  

Which makes him implicitly white. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

2019-09-03 02:30:53 UTC  

If you want me to treat you seriously you must make yourself someone worth considering.

2019-09-03 02:31:13 UTC  

Then someone serious.

2019-09-03 02:31:58 UTC  

And if you want me to take you seriously, you need to actually pay attention to what the arguments are, instead of passing off your own obstinance and impenetrability as if it's somehow *my* fault.

2019-09-03 02:33:32 UTC  

I'd pay attention if you **had** an argument. You do not. You have a YT autist you want me to waste my time on only to have you ignore any response I give. Trolling is fun but it is not an argument of any sort.

2019-09-03 02:34:08 UTC  

To be fair, both of u were jumping all over the place...

2019-09-03 02:34:45 UTC  

I was having conversations with two different people.

2019-09-03 02:34:56 UTC  

I mean just now

2019-09-03 02:35:31 UTC  

(Even tho it hasn’t been going on that long with just the 2 ik)

2019-09-03 02:36:50 UTC  

Anyway, if u want to say something just go ahead lol

2019-09-03 02:37:09 UTC  

Races are generally recognized using multifactoral analysis. The Human species has sufficient total population FST to fit within the category of other species which have subspecies.

2019-09-03 02:37:15 UTC  

It's really not that hard to grasp.

2019-09-03 02:37:54 UTC  

The subcategories of humans don't need to be absolutely constrained into discrete categories to justify this. If they were, they might as well be entirely different species. They are not, obviously.

2019-09-03 02:38:36 UTC  

The article I linked explains all this in detail.

2019-09-03 02:38:59 UTC  

And even if that’s a thing, why does this exactly matter? (excluding average differences)

2019-09-03 02:39:26 UTC  

Because Jym is arguing there's no biologically valid reason to use racial categories.

2019-09-03 02:40:10 UTC  

That there isn't a sufficient level of distinction, and that humans don't conform to discrete groups strictly enough to justify it.

2019-09-03 02:41:26 UTC  

I mean even if that is a thing we are still really close biologically considering we can all procreate (properly anyway), but honestly I don’t really care provided we treat people equally regardless

2019-09-03 02:43:55 UTC  

Yes, we are still extremely close. Africans, Jews, Arabs, Indians, Chinese, as frustrating as some of our differences can be, are my brothers.

2019-09-03 02:45:12 UTC  

While I understand that, on aggregate, my culture and values are generally much more likely to conform to that of other white europeans, I can share common cause, interests, and designs with people who are not white. And there are even whites with which I share little ideologically in common.

2019-09-03 02:46:24 UTC  

Yep

2019-09-03 02:47:05 UTC  

Honestly wasn’t gonna go anywhere from there, so yeah

2019-09-03 02:48:08 UTC  

Understanding differences is a prerequisite to finding constructive ways of resolving them peacefully.

2019-09-03 02:48:19 UTC  

Oh Christ I don't want to have anything to do with *Europeans* that's where socialism comes from.....

2019-09-03 02:49:02 UTC  

LOL. Oh, I actually agree. The subset of Europeans that remained in Europe on average seem to be way more enthusiastic about socialism than the ones who came to the US, on average.

2019-09-03 02:51:38 UTC  

No. Europeans *invented* socialism. It comes from their demented mindset. Where kings dictate economies to unarmed peasants.

2019-09-03 02:52:39 UTC  

Now quick name the jew.....

2019-09-03 02:52:43 UTC  

Yawns...

2019-09-03 02:54:08 UTC  

There's no single point of origin for centrally planned economies. Socialism in particular, in a modern incarnation is both very european, and very jewish. Though one could argue such distributions are de facto often a feature of many *failed* states and economies, though with generally less veiled an intent.

2019-09-03 02:57:41 UTC  

I think to an extent, free markets grew as a product of new technologies and opportunities for trade outpacing the *capacity* for governments to actually control it all, and that as governments achieved newer methods of organization, policing, and monitoring, it became more appealing to the elites to push once again for tighter central planning.

2019-09-03 02:58:10 UTC  

Yet socialism as a formal idea comes from the degenerates in Yurip.

2019-09-03 02:58:11 UTC  

This is also a useful vehicle within democracies, particularly with widely expanded franchise.

2019-09-03 02:58:52 UTC  

Which in particular are you crediting?

2019-09-03 02:59:18 UTC  

As far as I'm aware, both Socialism, as a formal concept, and free markets as a formal concept, are european in origin.

2019-09-03 02:59:50 UTC  

Probably because they had the circumstances where there was really the opportunity to actually widely *debate* these systems and philosophies.