Message from @Jym
Discord ID: 618271673052954634
Anyway, I'm leaving this unfruitful discussion. All I'm saying is that it's not racially discriminatory to say that if race X has lower IQ, it's understandable they have lower achievement in society, in average.
I was making a jab at how he insisted the acknowledgement of biological basis for race is degenerate in some way
No it is biologically *incoherent* I meant you **ideas** are degenerate....
Maybe you'd have a point if you actually read the arguments and provided a real rebuttal to them.
Well. If you had an argument I might....
I LINKED you some of them. And I wrote others out.
You refused to read some, and handwaved others.
You linked imigurs where you painted boxes around names you founf 'Jewish".
No, I'm talking about maybe a week or more ago
The last time I got tired of you?
If you had an argument you would state it.
I have, in the past.
I argued with you at length.
**BEHOLD, LOLI BUTTS!!!**
Instead you want me to go chasing your whitefu.
Ryan Faulk is a fag, lol
But he's an autistic fag.
Which makes him implicitly white. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Then someone serious.
And if you want me to take you seriously, you need to actually pay attention to what the arguments are, instead of passing off your own obstinance and impenetrability as if it's somehow *my* fault.
I'd pay attention if you **had** an argument. You do not. You have a YT autist you want me to waste my time on only to have you ignore any response I give. Trolling is fun but it is not an argument of any sort.
To be fair, both of u were jumping all over the place...
I was having conversations with two different people.
I mean just now
(Even tho it hasn’t been going on that long with just the 2 ik)
Anyway, if u want to say something just go ahead lol
Races are generally recognized using multifactoral analysis. The Human species has sufficient total population FST to fit within the category of other species which have subspecies.
It's really not that hard to grasp.
The subcategories of humans don't need to be absolutely constrained into discrete categories to justify this. If they were, they might as well be entirely different species. They are not, obviously.
The article I linked explains all this in detail.
And even if that’s a thing, why does this exactly matter? (excluding average differences)
Because Jym is arguing there's no biologically valid reason to use racial categories.
That there isn't a sufficient level of distinction, and that humans don't conform to discrete groups strictly enough to justify it.
I mean even if that is a thing we are still really close biologically considering we can all procreate (properly anyway), but honestly I don’t really care provided we treat people equally regardless
Yes, we are still extremely close. Africans, Jews, Arabs, Indians, Chinese, as frustrating as some of our differences can be, are my brothers.
While I understand that, on aggregate, my culture and values are generally much more likely to conform to that of other white europeans, I can share common cause, interests, and designs with people who are not white. And there are even whites with which I share little ideologically in common.
Yep