test ship

When you've said "most do"

>Yet can't prove that

Zumwalt was supposed to be the first of a new class

Polakistanis do *a lot* of meats served cold.

but they put so many bells and whistles....

A failed class and was scrapped.

<:brainlet:505799727657254922>

Yeah but animal before the Zumwalt there were probably like 5 other ships with major power issues, and that was because of retrofitting

agreed

look at the CGs

huh? the Zumwalt class has a large **surplus** of power available

@Porkchop Because it's main armaments weren't installed

^^

they have their guns still

just no ammo

ehhehhe

https://pluralist.com/magnus-soderlund-swedish-scientist-cannibalism-climate-change/

https://www.foxnews.com/world/swedish-scientist-eat-human-flesh-climate-change

wake up A-new-piss, that article is 2 days old

Those weren't the originally planned guns and they didn't get as many

Like this. Adds great flavor to pretty much any soup you're making. @Lucienne d'Anwyl Thank you for listening to my gay food autism, I'm done nao.
https://youtu.be/l3cExV93Iak?t=563

just chop it up

@Anubis muh prions

I don't speak BLYAT sorry

throw into the broth

@Weez, "Congressional subcommittee members questioned that the Navy completed such a sweeping re-evaluation of the world threat picture in just a few weeks, after spending some 13 years and $10 billion on the development of the surface ship program known as DD-21, then DD(X), and finally DDG-1000.[27] Subsequently, Chief of Naval Operations Gary Roughead cited the need to provide area air defense and specific new threats such as ballistic missiles and the possession of anti-ship missiles by groups such as Hezbollah.[29] The mooted structural problems have not been discussed in public. Navy Secretary Donald Winter said on 4 September that "Making certain that we have – I'll just say, a destroyer – in the '09 budget is more important than whether that’s a DDG 1000 or a DDG 51""

Zumwalt was known as 3 seperate programs

eat human brain for mor prions in your diet

DDG-21, DDG-X, DDG-100,

3 Programs with completely different aims, then they thought to throw it all into one ship

No wonder it failed.

same ship from the start

not completely different aims

https://youtu.be/S1NeVOjwtTw

all meant to be the next-gen destroyer to replace ddg51

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPGpoUN29zk

same program just keep changing it's name for politcally reasons

Yall need to subscribe to this channel

It has some of the neatest engineering explanations

just did Uksio