Message from @Gelnak

Discord ID: 614168644380917847


2019-08-22 18:44:19 UTC  

He never mentioned communism.

2019-08-22 18:44:20 UTC  

Women think 80% of men are "below average"

2019-08-22 18:44:22 UTC  

This is what happens when you let your women get out of control.

2019-08-22 18:44:26 UTC  

Wonder why

2019-08-22 18:44:38 UTC  

Women think 80% of men on dating websites are below average.

2019-08-22 18:44:42 UTC  

That may well actually be true

2019-08-22 18:44:55 UTC  

It's all getting too much. I'm going to drop a toaster into the ocean

2019-08-22 18:45:13 UTC  

Don't go brother <:pepehug:597826337931132948>

2019-08-22 18:45:13 UTC  

The question we really need to ask is what the democrats are going to do about the tinder match gap

2019-08-22 18:45:18 UTC  

Imagine being a woman on one of these websites, the sheer volume of men coming after an even mildly pretty one would be immense

2019-08-22 18:45:30 UTC  

Exactly why it's done @Kazza

2019-08-22 18:45:42 UTC  

Oh, I wont be in the ocean

2019-08-22 18:45:43 UTC  

You don't even need to be particularly attractive either

2019-08-22 18:45:44 UTC  

Ive seen women change from just a few guys attention, let alone 13000

2019-08-22 18:45:55 UTC  

Average and just below are fine too

2019-08-22 18:46:07 UTC  

every day my faith in the other gender decreases tbh

2019-08-22 18:46:14 UTC  

@Kazza - Honestly need a dating website that limits men to contacting no more than one woman per day. You'll shut down all of the pick-up artists, and with women not having their inbox flooded, they'll be more likely to fucking respond to anyone who writes a message.

2019-08-22 18:46:36 UTC  

The problem is men who write "hey" to 500 women a day, and treat it like a god damned numbers game.

2019-08-22 18:46:37 UTC  

you can legitimately be a horridly ugly man and if you at least comb your hair, trim your neckbeard and have a shower, some girl will accept you

2019-08-22 18:46:54 UTC  

That should go both ways. Make people think about whom they actually message @Arthur Grayborn

2019-08-22 18:46:55 UTC  

but then wamen wont get that sick ass serotonin hit from getting send 10 dicks a minute

2019-08-22 18:46:57 UTC  

Thats a damn good idea Arthur

2019-08-22 18:47:06 UTC  

Premium services, should just increase the number of people they can message

2019-08-22 18:47:18 UTC  

So you actually get thoughtful interaction between the two people

2019-08-22 18:47:20 UTC  

Regardless of gender

2019-08-22 18:47:29 UTC  

Yeah. If you're a paypig you can contact 5 people instead of just 1. Still a hard daily limit though.

2019-08-22 18:47:30 UTC  

To a lot of men, it is a numbers game

2019-08-22 18:47:38 UTC  

Both sides will have an 'investment' in the discussion

2019-08-22 18:47:45 UTC  

get ready for a based opinion
*maybe people should go outside instead of pining for thots online*

2019-08-22 18:47:50 UTC  

I'd probably up those numbers @Arthur Grayborn

2019-08-22 18:48:07 UTC  

25 new contacts per day. Payment increases it up to 45

2019-08-22 18:48:31 UTC  

Nah, just one. That way people will feel the need to be more selective about who they message.

2019-08-22 18:49:11 UTC  

The general idea is to not make women feel special, and the way you do that is to prevent stupid men from contacting more than 20 women per day.

2019-08-22 18:49:23 UTC  

sounds like sexism to me

2019-08-22 18:49:27 UTC  

Women can always get out there and send their own messages.

2019-08-22 18:49:33 UTC  

nice try trump supporter

2019-08-22 18:49:41 UTC  

Up to one person per day, unless they're a paypig. Then it's 5.

2019-08-22 18:49:57 UTC  

That slows down everything to where it would hardly be usable tbh

2019-08-22 18:50:10 UTC  

Inactive accounts which haven't been deactivated for example

2019-08-22 18:50:15 UTC  

Non serious accounts

2019-08-22 18:50:35 UTC  

You can't always tell which account is and isn't in use, or is serious, or legitimate