Message from @Mikey
Discord ID: 616005093866733681
Imagine demanding that sanitary services clan up your toilet where you tried to flush a shitstained blanket
That's china in a nutshell
No
We never did
no what?
we are not voices in your head
It could take a thousand times more nukes than we ever had, still wouldn't in themselves trigger a nuclear winter *unless* they are all hitting burnable material.
We would need around 100x the nuclear stockpile to kill 99.99% of humans
it's not just about detonations
I know
I'm gonna need a citation for this
If you wanted the shortest-term planet-fucking, sure.
it's about the systems abilty to recover
Busy_later
This sounds like fallout rp material
Werkom to china, laowai skum
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/15/wild-chinese-sturgeon-on-brink-of-extinction-in-polluted-yangtze#img-1
You don't need x amount of explosions.
weaker system = less nukes required
you just need lots of fire and ash.
^^
Yup
Remember, lads, it's not 12 years, it's 8 months left before global warming murders us all <:smugon:512048583806025739>
The Yangtze is more polluted than every river in Europe iirc
the nukes do little damange aside from throwing dirt into the air
a million nukes hitting the same spot won't cause a nuclear winter
you got into the bleach as a kid didn't you
that is why nukes are set to go over just over the ground
no
it is the dust and blast wave that does the real damage
<:smugon:512048583806025739>
Certain geographies are largely unaffected by ash in the air
Do y'all understand the concept of the nuke
You ate the toothpaste?
yup
nukes are detonated at an altitude based on the energetic mass expansion of the nucleic bonds in the fuel.
I never ate toothpaste
incorrect; i'll get the data
remember reading the JTAC report
>> when you realise that one volcano can negate global warming in just one year
Nukes are pretty fucking weak in the grand scale of things
When you realize thay 1 volcano can outdo a shitton of nukes