Message from @stathelle

Discord ID: 617522695747272722


2019-09-01 00:52:37 UTC  

Trouble is that the boomers don't actually enforce the law or make laws that are on point. Most of them, really.

2019-09-01 00:52:39 UTC  

discord isn't really a social media persay like twitter I mean

2019-09-01 00:52:39 UTC  

This is basic..

2019-09-01 00:52:53 UTC  

The big things in comms just have upward inertia.

2019-09-01 00:52:55 UTC  

goodnyaght everynyan! rember to sleeps or be sleepy

2019-09-01 00:52:59 UTC  

I use this instead of Fashbook

2019-09-01 00:53:02 UTC  

Night @Danacrag We don't hate you.

2019-09-01 00:53:08 UTC  

@Zakhan , the laws can't be enforced without excessive violations of civil liberties

2019-09-01 00:53:08 UTC  

Especially when they have a lot of fucking undeserved boons.

2019-09-01 00:53:09 UTC  

<:GWcentrallGoodNightBOYE:395626850887532544>

2019-09-01 00:53:13 UTC  

Night and have pet @Danacrag

2019-09-01 00:53:34 UTC  

What's stopping you from creating a Facebook account with the sole purpose of pushing people to other websites? @stathelle

2019-09-01 00:53:37 UTC  

Nothing.

2019-09-01 00:53:43 UTC  

It's being done already.

2019-09-01 00:53:46 UTC  

@ManAnimal They must be enforced or you start going down the slippery slope of not enforcing your laws, which erodes the entirety of your legal code.

2019-09-01 00:53:58 UTC  

So you either find a happy medium, in which you adjust them properly.

2019-09-01 00:54:02 UTC  

OR YOU FUCKING ENFORCE THE LAWS.

2019-09-01 00:54:25 UTC  

i agree 100%; but that happens when they write conflicting laws that realistically cannot be enforece uniformly

2019-09-01 00:54:39 UTC  

Then those laws must be reformed.

2019-09-01 00:54:42 UTC  

^^

2019-09-01 00:54:43 UTC  

Yep, nothing, however that takes a lot of effort and power. Power and effort that the big media and tech have. They have the resources to keep people on there, and unless you have a lot more moderates who see the need to switch, the vast majority of Americans won't switch over.

2019-09-01 00:54:49 UTC  

exactly

2019-09-01 00:54:56 UTC  

basically... section 230 needs to be reexamined.. on how it shuld be enforced and so on

2019-09-01 00:55:03 UTC  

Then offer a better product. @stathelle

2019-09-01 00:55:24 UTC  

The product you're offering doesn't seem that good if consumers don't want to use it.

2019-09-01 00:55:32 UTC  

Maybe you should try revisiting it..

2019-09-01 00:55:35 UTC  

And get a better product.

2019-09-01 00:55:38 UTC  

my original point is that if you allow the gov the ability to decide when they can tell private companies who and what they can list, in order to enforce the gov would have to examine EVERYOINE's machine at the slightest accusation

2019-09-01 00:55:40 UTC  

Maybe then people will use it.

2019-09-01 00:55:55 UTC  

that kind of power would be insane to give to the gov

2019-09-01 00:55:56 UTC  

its not the gov enforcing what they can say

2019-09-01 00:56:04 UTC  

its the gov saying they cant restrict what people say

2019-09-01 00:56:07 UTC  

its very different

2019-09-01 00:56:07 UTC  

@Weez consumers can be manipulated all the time as they are by the media. There is a reason we have snake oil laws

2019-09-01 00:56:17 UTC  

@Weez A better product isn't the problem. Effective monopolisation over market shares, the weight of having all the money and the playing field not being fair to the smaller competitors are the problems.

2019-09-01 00:56:31 UTC  

The consumer isn't forced to use Facebook, nor are they being manipulated into.

2019-09-01 00:56:33 UTC  

Which is why every social media company should be broken up

2019-09-01 00:56:36 UTC  

They're using it because it's a good product.

2019-09-01 00:56:37 UTC  

@Weez Well, I'm just saying, the amount of damage that will be done before you can get many people to switch is a lot

2019-09-01 00:56:37 UTC  

level the playing field

2019-09-01 00:56:58 UTC  

so we can see as best as we can WHICH companies are best