Message from @2 point 2 zero
Discord ID: 634710382170079235
was it rape?
Like none of your local Romanian town rapists will ever come close to the Ghenghis record
it isnt rape if women is conquered <:powerful:595334910764515338>
Yes, there's such a bad paper because there are broken methodology studies everywhere
those listening won't have the time to process and most stat analysis are interpretation
Why did statisticial drown in a lake?
Lake was 4 feet deep on average
make an argument that stands on it's own merit with as little external evidence required to comprehend the argument's merits
don't assume everyone listening has the same detailed knowledge that you do
Well ya, most stats you can easily just tell yourself "ok, so it's like this, now apply X, where X represents other potential variables that won't affect me in this localized area." for example.
doing so just plays on the pride and insecurities of the audience
hah, ex..freudian?
it's not effective persuasion
well, anyone with an iq of 120 can make stats say whatever the fuck they want them to say
<:spurdo:500782204788670474>
This vote is going to be narrow as fuck
jesus..
Tighter than an Islamic bride.
that chart is meaningless considering the margin of error
too close to call
Narrower than a twink's butthole
that's a classic example; polls traditionally show at least a 4% margin of error
It's not a poll
so any result is +/- 4%
Notice how Jack didn't say its set in stone tho
You guys remember Tony48219?
as i said, 'my example is a classic example'
Yeah but it's not a poll so it's not comparable
follow the flow of the conversation before your graph appeared
You lads remember Tony from paranormal activity? He was a G tbh
You lads remember Tony Blair?
God's trying to tie-in
But I get yer point
ty <:smugon:512048583806025739>
ugh
most 'measurments' be they polls or otherwise have a margin of error
You lads remember John Major?
even phsycial dimensions have tolerances
BoJo is the modern day Churchill tbh