doing so just plays on the pride and insecurities of the audience

hah, ex..freudian?

it's not effective persuasion

well, anyone with an iq of 120 can make stats say whatever the fuck they want them to say

<:spurdo:500782204788670474>

Mood tbh

This vote is going to be narrow as fuck

jesus..

Tighter than an Islamic bride.

that chart is meaningless considering the margin of error

too close to call

<:thunk:462282216467333140> wanted to mention that but no one was interested at first

Narrower than a twink's butthole

that's a classic example; polls traditionally show at least a 4% margin of error

It's not a poll

so any result is +/- 4%

Notice how Jack didn't say its set in stone tho

You guys remember Tony48219?

as i said, 'my example is a classic example'

Yeah but it's not a poll so it's not comparable

follow the flow of the conversation before your graph appeared

You lads remember Tony from paranormal activity? He was a G tbh

You lads remember Tony Blair?

God's trying to tie-in

But I get yer point

ty <:smugon:512048583806025739>

ugh

most 'measurments' be they polls or otherwise have a margin of error

You lads remember John Major?

.

even phsycial dimensions have tolerances

BoJo is the modern day Churchill tbh

It's not a measurement

Churchill was kinda trash

the chart reflects data, does it not?

alll data is a metric

Not really

bullshit, Chirchill was great.

what is a metric?

measurment

and so is bojo