Message from @Drywa11
Discord ID: 619897663298469898
you anti-revisionist bigot!
Literal blackwashing
I wonder (((who))) could possibly be behind it
Sure not any fellow (((white))) people
Honestly I'm not one to advocate book burning but I'd definitely burn copies of that shit
Ah yes yes yes it was not black and white, it was gray and fuzzy totallay because you see the Covington kids were totallay also in the wrong for..... standing around..... doing their thang............. so grayyyyy, totallayyyyy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LqOTVow_cE&t=165
Question, do you recall someone making a video about how youtube sorts the comment sections? I tried to look into it but i got very vague results stating that author has some control over them, that toxicity is a factor and that person writing it also is somehow ranked. Likes matter too but that is less interesting.
It seems to me there might be something very obvious in there which a lot of youtube video makers miss when they are getting all rawr about monetization issues since it strikers closer to home.
Not to mention they as video producers are part of the people who "gets protection" when comments are sorted.
I only know certain key words and phrases get censored
Like "honk honk" or "clown world"
You basically have to camouflage it so it gets through the censor
Otherwise idk
"nigger", "faggot", "retard", "kike", "shitskin", "subhuman", "spic" etc. are also censored
Every time you post a comment, right click on the timestamp and select "Open in New Incognito Tab"
If you can see your comment, it means it isn't censored
Otherwise only you could see your comment and it would've been shadowbanned and others couldn't see it
Some ways to get around it is to replace a with @ or o with 0
"f@ggot" or "h0nk h0nk"
***POLITICAL QUESTION:*** *What are, are rights (such as positive & negative rights, anti-discrimination laws, minimum wages, defamation, borders (in the sense of immigration policy), privacy rights, universal sufferage, safety regulation, the harm principle, lobbying, etc...) ?*
I guess political rights also, if you have a government to defend property rights.
So....no Privacy Rights?
<:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>
no speech either bucko
Lmao
no lawyer
no jury of peers
No right to a speedy trial
Or right to have a fair jail sentence
>or even the right to life
no warrant needed for searches
Drywall confirmed pro-abortion?
probably
a lot of libertarians/ancaps are
Not even like reasonably, I reckon
Like late-term
Probably even wants abortion survivors (fetuses that survive) to just die or something
I don't know on which planet Tim Pool lives on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTGxOjPRTLY
99% girls wear pants, 99.99% boys wear pants. How is that not 'gender neutral'?
We don't see women rejected employment for wearing trousers. Men crossdressing would never see a day of employment as they would be deemed perverts. Even trannies get more tolerance than hairy men would if they chose to wear a skirt.