Literal blackwashing

I wonder (((who))) could possibly be behind it

Sure not any fellow (((white))) people

Honestly I'm not one to advocate book burning but I'd definitely burn copies of that shit

Ah yes yes yes it was not black and white, it was gray and fuzzy totallay because you see the Covington kids were totallay also in the wrong for..... standing around..... doing their thang............. so grayyyyy, totallayyyyy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LqOTVow_cE&t=165

Question, do you recall someone making a video about how youtube sorts the comment sections? I tried to look into it but i got very vague results stating that author has some control over them, that toxicity is a factor and that person writing it also is somehow ranked. Likes matter too but that is less interesting.

It seems to me there might be something very obvious in there which a lot of youtube video makers miss when they are getting all rawr about monetization issues since it strikers closer to home.

Not to mention they as video producers are part of the people who "gets protection" when comments are sorted.

I only know certain key words and phrases get censored

Like "honk honk" or "clown world"

You basically have to camouflage it so it gets through the censor

Otherwise idk

"nigger", "faggot", "retard", "kike", "shitskin", "subhuman", "spic" etc. are also censored

Every time you post a comment, right click on the timestamp and select "Open in New Incognito Tab"

If you can see your comment, it means it isn't censored

Otherwise only you could see your comment and it would've been shadowbanned and others couldn't see it

Some ways to get around it is to replace a with @ or o with 0

"f@ggot" or "h0nk h0nk"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk8aW389A-Q

***POLITICAL QUESTION:*** *What are, are rights (such as positive & negative rights, anti-discrimination laws, minimum wages, defamation, borders (in the sense of immigration policy), privacy rights, universal sufferage, safety regulation, the harm principle, lobbying, etc...) ?*

The only rights that should be enforced are property rights.

I guess political rights also, if you have a government to defend property rights.

So....no Privacy Rights?

<:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

no speech either bucko

Lmao

no lawyer

no jury of peers

No right to a speedy trial

Or right to have a fair jail sentence

>or even the right to life

no warrant needed for searches

Drywall confirmed pro-abortion?

probably

a lot of libertarians/ancaps are

Not even like reasonably, I reckon

Like late-term

Probably even wants abortion survivors (fetuses that survive) to just die or something

I don't know on which planet Tim Pool lives on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTGxOjPRTLY

99% girls wear pants, 99.99% boys wear pants. How is that not 'gender neutral'?

We don't see women rejected employment for wearing trousers. Men crossdressing would never see a day of employment as they would be deemed perverts. Even trannies get more tolerance than hairy men would if they chose to wear a skirt.

How the fuck are trousers not gender-neutral attire if both genders can wear them without social damage (or in worse case, violence directed at them)? Tim Pool is so fucking blue pilled that he probably doesn't even know that "men" is not a fucking gender. Men are gender-neutral. Only women have a gender. There's women, and others.