Message from @Hopix

Discord ID: 619595631933128714

Jokerfaic
2019-09-06 17:53:53 UTC  

oh no, bitch, you made the claim, burden of proof is on you

ETBrooD
2019-09-06 17:54:11 UTC  

Ah right, the burden is on me when it's convenient

ETBrooD
2019-09-06 17:54:14 UTC  

(ignore that we both made a claim)

Jokerfaic
2019-09-06 17:54:21 UTC  

when you make a claim, yes

ETBrooD
2019-09-06 17:54:26 UTC  

You also made a claim

Weez
2019-09-06 17:54:32 UTC  

"Go ahead, make an ass out of yourself, as usual"

Jokerfaic
2019-09-06 17:54:33 UTC  

I disputed your claim

Weez
2019-09-06 17:54:33 UTC  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

Weez
2019-09-06 17:54:41 UTC  

"I want to see you debunk my claim then"

Weez
2019-09-06 17:54:44 UTC  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

ETBrooD
2019-09-06 17:55:19 UTC  

So you didn't make the claim that the assets are still frozen?

Weez
2019-09-06 17:58:09 UTC  

Tim "Bring back Militias" Pool.

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:09:34 UTC  

Someone on FB said Boris could fill up the House of Lords with a load of Brexiteer lords to sway the result

Is that possible?

2K
2019-09-06 18:10:34 UTC  

the bill passed from lords already

2K
2019-09-06 18:10:46 UTC  

like 4-5 hours ago

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:10:48 UTC  

oh really?

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:10:53 UTC  

Didn't see the news on it

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:11:48 UTC  

Ah yes, found it

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:11:50 UTC  

guess not then

Monstrous Moonshine
2019-09-06 18:13:32 UTC  

> Google’s senior director of U.S. public policy, Adam Kovacevich appeared to describe the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) as a “sideshow Circus,” in a leaked audio recording in which he also argued that Google should remain a sponsor of the conference to “steer” the conservative movement “away from nationalistic and incendiary comments.”

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:13:44 UTC  

Surely whether we've left on the 31st would influence voting intention

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:15:32 UTC  

Under the bill - introduced by Labour MP Hilary Benn - Boris Johnson might have to request a Brexit extension on 19 October, pushing the deadline back to 31 January 2020.

But there are two scenarios in which he would not have to do this:

MPs approve a Brexit deal in another meaningful vote (remember them?)
MPs vote in favour of leaving the EU without a deal

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:15:39 UTC  

I can't see either of those things happening

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:15:46 UTC  

So extension it is

2K
2019-09-06 18:16:50 UTC  

now imagine bojo having to go and ask EU for an extention

2K
2019-09-06 18:16:53 UTC  

lmao

GalaxyBrainer
2019-09-06 18:17:37 UTC  

how 'bout we leave, anyway

Weez
2019-09-06 18:17:44 UTC  

The EU can refuse. @Hopix

2K
2019-09-06 18:17:51 UTC  

they wont

Weez
2019-09-06 18:17:57 UTC  

EU nations could VETO the extension.

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:18:03 UTC  

I'm aware but I can't see them refusing

Weez
2019-09-06 18:18:06 UTC  

Boris could theoretically veto it.

Weez
2019-09-06 18:18:20 UTC  

The Queen could refuse royal ascent of the law.

Hopix
2019-09-06 18:18:33 UTC  

Does the Queen ever do that?

2K
2019-09-06 18:18:40 UTC  

the only incentive they had to refuse was back in april and it was the EU elections

Weez
2019-09-06 18:18:44 UTC  

Not recently, though it's her right.