Message from @Weez
Discord ID: 619591285669494806
well if he gets his space force that might be closer to accurate
I don't think the deal was working btw but w/e, that's just a matter ofopinion
.... no?
Are you clairvoyant and you can predict the future?
the IAEA was right in Iran during the deal, monitoring every nuclear facility to make sure they were operating in accordance
Yeah right sure, Iran good boy, Iran nice and never do shit when assets frozen
they were following the deal to the letter
Trump unfreezes assets, threatens more sanctions - Iran goes apeshit
Totallay reasonable to predict a very happy Iran future
Deal would've worked perfectly, this is not opinion, this is fact, llalala
once again, you have absolutely nothing to substanciate that he just "gave them back their money" and hasn't in fact just put more sanctions
I want to see you debunk my claim then
Go ahead, make an ass out of yourself, as usual
oh no, bitch, you made the claim, burden of proof is on you
Ah right, the burden is on me when it's convenient
(ignore that we both made a claim)
when you make a claim, yes
You also made a claim
"Go ahead, make an ass out of yourself, as usual"
I disputed your claim
"I want to see you debunk my claim then"
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586> <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
So you didn't make the claim that the assets are still frozen?
Tim "Bring back Militias" Pool.
Someone on FB said Boris could fill up the House of Lords with a load of Brexiteer lords to sway the result
Is that possible?
the bill passed from lords already
like 4-5 hours ago
oh really?
Didn't see the news on it
Ah yes, found it
guess not then
> Google’s senior director of U.S. public policy, Adam Kovacevich appeared to describe the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) as a “sideshow Circus,” in a leaked audio recording in which he also argued that Google should remain a sponsor of the conference to “steer” the conservative movement “away from nationalistic and incendiary comments.”
Surely whether we've left on the 31st would influence voting intention
Under the bill - introduced by Labour MP Hilary Benn - Boris Johnson might have to request a Brexit extension on 19 October, pushing the deadline back to 31 January 2020.
But there are two scenarios in which he would not have to do this:
MPs approve a Brexit deal in another meaningful vote (remember them?)
MPs vote in favour of leaving the EU without a deal
I can't see either of those things happening