Message from @ETBrooD
Discord ID: 635480829820272660
https://9gag.com/gag/a3RQRGQ#comment boi did this post trigger me
Crazy how much power you get just from simply having a massive population
<:powerful:595334910764515338>
Any Aussies?
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck Caspian report is my nigga
Nice to see another fan of him
Apparently Weez watches him
I watched his video about the Pre-Islamic history of the Middle East.
I’m starting to wonder how much of the civil unrest in chile is engineered, possibly by george soros. He’s buying massive amounts of farmland and flooding these nations with African immigrants.
Eh?
Why would he target Chile?
Wtf does he have to gain from all of this?
Genious
The whole chinese neoimperialist policy of buying strategic assets all over the place.
That only works because of the compromises in sovereignty that are the international treaty courts.
Without them, states could simply nationalize assets that are held by foreign enemies (or states with whom relations are degraded). As it stands, only a couple of countries can do that (The US, mainly) and get away with it.
Makes sense that he sees actual Nationalistic leaders as dangerous enemies
Would you really call them nationalistic?
obviously
I'd call them expansionist, ultimately globalist
Different tactics, fourth reich
they want their nation to dominate
Expansionism and colonialism, idk how that's linked to nationalism
it's done to further the strength of their nation
How are they globalist? They do not want one world with everyone mixing together. Their own nation is extremely ethnically homogenous and basically entirely racially homogenous. Which nations have they expanded into militarily?
Then why is China trying to have superwealthy agents in every single country's economy of the world?
If China had its way it'd unite the whole of Asia right now
Plus Australia
Plus parts of Africa
But why would they do that? "unite Asia, plus Australia, plus parts of Africa"? Their is nothing to suggest they'd do that kind of globalist act. Obviously Hong Kong isn't an example since they're Chinese and it belongs to China anyway.
If you want to point towards "superwealthy agents in every single country" I think we can think of another group that fits that bill much more so than the Chinese.
If only the West was as Nationalistic as China's leadership.
https://i.imgur.com/9bJwaeh.png
Maybe you need to understand something about China's expansionist history
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=403&v=UWqVzZnwnOk
They conquered land many times, that land was reclaimed also many times.
Towards the end of the 19th century they lost quite a lot of land that they had previously conquered, it was reclaimed, and then China reclaimed parts of that again in the 20th century, but not all of it.
Since then things have stabilized a bit, but China has not stopped trying to expand, unlike literally every single western nation.
China is not nationalist, if they were, they would just stop trying to conquer land and instead rely exclusively on trade and diplomacy etc.
Their international policy has only changed on a surface level because other nations are being defended much better these days. That's why China is following a different approach now, much less overt and bloody, instead more through economic subversion and the consistent erasure of people's history.
China is, from a philosophical point of view, basically the same as the Third Reich, just more modern in its methods.