Message from @fvriovs
Discord ID: 647929514357161994
I need an amazon in my life. <:why:462286147473637407>
Big Tidee Tribal Gorl
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
Amazon and Audible are the only ads I get on mobile
That is weird
.... Except isn't that what they're not doing and ought to? integrate?
also Britain's way too late to bitch and moan about what colors of skin are and aren't british
within the territories they claimed, anyway
Not sure how that makes sense.
Because the people of the lands Britain conquered did not become British.
Yes. They weren't british because they said so, they were british because the empire said so, like with the raj
They became British subjects.
Rome had a similar modus operandi
Rome granted citizenship to loyal allies.
People conquered by Rome were not immediately granted citizenship.
Its almost like Empire is an ill-sought-after title
Even the Edict of Caracalla, granting citizenship to all free residents of the Empire, did not apply to those with the status of *dedictio*
Rome had a very stratified network of citizen classes, of which citizens were at the top and a significant minority.
well ok yes, slavery and serfdom do complicate the comparison
As many as 90% of the Roman Empire's population in the 1st and 2nd centuries belonged to the *peregrinus* class.
Free residents with little to no recognition under Roman civil law.
Most Italians weren't even Roman citizens until the end of the Social War in 90-89 BC.
And even then it took another 40 years or so before *all* Italians were citizens.
Citizenship was a gift.
Empires do not typically fully elevate to the highest social class the people they conquer. Empires are not built for the *purpose* of making everyone else like you. It's just a useful tool of control when you do take over.
That's the main difference between Imperialism and Irredentism












