I am not sure what is the deal in having boys crossdressed as girls though...
Like... the observer wants to see feminine appearance... but with a dick...

So contradicktory

Weird how I walked into a chick-fil-a and I didn't burst into flames, I don't get what these faggots are foaming at the mouth for

They're just pissed that theres someone who hasn't bent over backwards for them.

I need an amazon in my life. <:why:462286147473637407>

Big Tidee Tribal Gorl

https://twitter.com/SwerdnaKi/status/1198356672714072065

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

Amazon and Audible are the only ads I get on mobile

That is weird

https://tenor.com/view/santa-claus-smiling-king-gif-15613821

.... Except isn't that what they're not doing and ought to? integrate?

also Britain's way too late to bitch and moan about what colors of skin are and aren't british

within the territories they claimed, anyway

Not sure how that makes sense.

Are you referring to the British Empire?

Because the people of the lands Britain conquered did not become British.

Yes. They weren't british because they said so, they were british because the empire said so, like with the raj

They became British subjects.

Rome had a similar modus operandi

Rome granted citizenship to loyal allies.

People conquered by Rome were not immediately granted citizenship.

Its almost like Empire is an ill-sought-after title

Even the Edict of Caracalla, granting citizenship to all free residents of the Empire, did not apply to those with the status of *dedictio*

Rome had a very stratified network of citizen classes, of which citizens were at the top and a significant minority.

well ok yes, slavery and serfdom do complicate the comparison

As many as 90% of the Roman Empire's population in the 1st and 2nd centuries belonged to the *peregrinus* class.

Free residents with little to no recognition under Roman civil law.