Its better to just pick people from those already exhibiting the right behaviour then training somebody who has no skill because if we're being real here you have to fucking work at any skill to really develop it and those people fucking won't do that if they don't already show the initiative

but you get my point, it's not a lot of catchup when he already has a large baseline

true. but there are different types of initiative

most of it is confidence building in the new role, fix it with additional training

not so sure about that

some people lack confidence, yes but also some people aren't suited for that particular task

confidence from competence

Its way broader then that

is my meaning

it's as much about matching the tool with the task as anything elsle

arrogance is different

i do think "train the person who has been doing the job to lead" is better than "bring in someone else trained to lead"

definately true

and find someone who doesn't WISH to lead

but recongizes the importance of leadership

and is good at it

Funny how the motto, "I'm in charge... until I die or someone better comes along to replace me" comes to mind

mmm

People in charge will not promote people they consider threats to their position

Often

if they won't , these are bad leaders

competition and not doing right by your community...

hence why I said, "Someone that doesn't want to lead but rather wants the best leader"

In a perfect world yeah

if the best is him, he'll take point

but he doesn't HAVE to take point

It's partly why the elite class would rather import low class workers rather than empower their own people to encourage them to breed, it invites too much competition

leaders are best chosen by those being led

People who are looked to, to lead vs people who take charge and lead

yep

Also not always because not everyone wants the leader that will make them work harder for example

Longer hours, fuck that

well, that's when you end up having union reps

rather than leaders

**Shudders**

it's hard these days because i think to how many of those standards were the function of boys generally being raised to beleif certain behaviour was noble while other behaviour was cowardly

Its a pretty big free for all nowadays behaviour wise

when to challenge the leader and when to punch someone who challenged the leader at the wrong moment

realpolitik of the workplace

It says a lot about leaders, policy makers, etc, to actively repress their population in order to secure their position. See similar in school, this sociopathic behavior...

The solution to this in the free market is to just go to another company and let them take advantage of your talents