Message from @Samaritan™

Discord ID: 642946357740568606


2019-11-10 04:33:09 UTC  

most of it is confidence building in the new role, fix it with additional training

2019-11-10 04:33:19 UTC  

not so sure about that

2019-11-10 04:33:41 UTC  

some people lack confidence, yes but also some people aren't suited for that particular task

2019-11-10 04:33:52 UTC  

confidence from competence

2019-11-10 04:33:55 UTC  

Its way broader then that

2019-11-10 04:33:56 UTC  

is my meaning

2019-11-10 04:33:59 UTC  

it's as much about matching the tool with the task as anything elsle

2019-11-10 04:34:25 UTC  

arrogance is different

2019-11-10 04:34:28 UTC  

i do think "train the person who has been doing the job to lead" is better than "bring in someone else trained to lead"

2019-11-10 04:35:27 UTC  

definately true

2019-11-10 04:35:42 UTC  

and find someone who doesn't WISH to lead

2019-11-10 04:35:57 UTC  

but recongizes the importance of leadership

2019-11-10 04:36:02 UTC  

and is good at it

2019-11-10 04:37:01 UTC  

Funny how the motto, "I'm in charge... until I die or someone better comes along to replace me" comes to mind

2019-11-10 04:38:07 UTC  

mmm

2019-11-10 04:38:13 UTC  

People in charge will not promote people they consider threats to their position

2019-11-10 04:38:19 UTC  

Often

2019-11-10 04:38:35 UTC  

if they won't , these are bad leaders

2019-11-10 04:38:40 UTC  

competition and not doing right by your community...

2019-11-10 04:38:59 UTC  

hence why I said, "Someone that doesn't want to lead but rather wants the best leader"

2019-11-10 04:39:17 UTC  

In a perfect world yeah

2019-11-10 04:39:27 UTC  

if the best is him, he'll take point

2019-11-10 04:39:38 UTC  

but he doesn't HAVE to take point

2019-11-10 04:39:42 UTC  

It's partly why the elite class would rather import low class workers rather than empower their own people to encourage them to breed, it invites too much competition

2019-11-10 04:39:52 UTC  

leaders are best chosen by those being led

2019-11-10 04:40:00 UTC  

People who are looked to, to lead vs people who take charge and lead

2019-11-10 04:40:15 UTC  

yep

2019-11-10 04:40:20 UTC  

Also not always because not everyone wants the leader that will make them work harder for example

2019-11-10 04:40:29 UTC  

Longer hours, fuck that

2019-11-10 04:40:54 UTC  

well, that's when you end up having union reps

2019-11-10 04:40:59 UTC  

rather than leaders

2019-11-10 04:41:20 UTC  

**Shudders**

2019-11-10 04:42:21 UTC  

it's hard these days because i think to how many of those standards were the function of boys generally being raised to beleif certain behaviour was noble while other behaviour was cowardly

2019-11-10 04:42:57 UTC  

Its a pretty big free for all nowadays behaviour wise

2019-11-10 04:43:04 UTC  

when to challenge the leader and when to punch someone who challenged the leader at the wrong moment

2019-11-10 04:43:27 UTC  

realpolitik of the workplace

2019-11-10 04:43:33 UTC  

It says a lot about leaders, policy makers, etc, to actively repress their population in order to secure their position. See similar in school, this sociopathic behavior...

2019-11-10 04:44:10 UTC  

The solution to this in the free market is to just go to another company and let them take advantage of your talents

2019-11-10 04:44:11 UTC  

"not what you know but who you blow" comes to mind.

2019-11-10 04:44:13 UTC  

i think it is more actively repressing the unique differences between males and females

2019-11-10 04:44:32 UTC  

as well as the unique requirements each has to deal with