oy!

oy! oy! oy! oy! oy veeeeeeeeeereereeeeeeeeeRrRrrRRReEEEEEEE

I identify as a ball tip bic pen with schick hydro dynamic laser infusions

I just felt it had to be fake

in some way

6,000,000 IQ ^

https://www.newsweek.com/andrew-yang-calls-warren-sanders-tax-plan-disaster-1462653

UBI is a terrible idea.

Yang sucks China's Wang.

Just like his Gang.

Yang Gang deals Gang Weed.

Yang is trying to bribe people to win. No matter what his moral reasons are that's how Trump will spin it on him and eventually Warren will start to say it if he gains enough support to challenge her.

Yang will just look like a desperate politician that can't win without the promise of gibs

https://twitter.com/al_rashin/status/1180163472316932096

peak savior

Ubi isnt necessarily a bad idea under certain circumstances

For instance as Automation takes over more and more jobs we are going to have to invent a completely new economic system to deal with that eventuality

Ubi is an inhearently conservative idea Milton Friedman one if the great conservative economists supported the idea in his book capitalism and freedom.

It literally allows the dregs of society to stay breeding lol

*not if you shoot them*

In setiousness

People should have to have a license to procreate

Fucking christ there are too many people who should not breed

Ever

No ideas are good or bad until the government gets their hands on them. Then they are all bad ideas.

I maintain my heinlein view of govt

It should be small, efficient, and have little bearing on the daily lives of citizens

Its the libertarian question or maybe philosophical one. One should allegedly be intitled by nature for the attempt to reproduce and would in a sense excuse rape not in a criminal way but in a relative way regarding the aspect of life itself. On the way other hand, there is the health of society to consider in allowing certain populations from growing beyond a reasonably allowed range. Reasonable to whom, being contextual

>wants small government not meddling with people
>literally wants a license to frick

yeah not votin for ya

Of course that idea would just lead to another legal/illegal divide as packs of illegal anchor babies swarm the department stores

Even more tension would arise because so many people would ignore the license

In my state, we made marijuana legal and made ourselves a Sanctuary State because the cops can't be assed to do anything other than run speed traps.

How the hell would you fairly enforce such a thing?

A war on fricks would be even more impossible than a war on drugs

UBI is nothing short of wealth redistribution. Idc how automated things get. Also incentivizes laziness. Labor itself can be virtuous and humbling, and sometimes its good to bring a human element even into jobs that could otherwise be automated. Also, not everyone has the intelligence level for a career in STEM. Solid low-tier jobs provide a meaning for the lower castes of society, instead of letting them waste away mooching off the government and atrophying from a lack of environmental enrichment.

The twilight zone classic "The Brain Center at Whipple's" is relevant

The question is if businesses are as a collective selfless enough and figure out that the entire system of capitalism depends on society having workplaces.

If they dont, its ubi or total collapse

And what would you suggest moon? There will be no low skill labor jobs in the not so distant future. Low skill jobs are inhearently replaceable, how do you propose we deal with that?

See its not mutually exclusive wanting a small government and wanting licenses for more than one child, I dont think you would be voting for me because I dont believe in universal suffrage