Message from @notaglobe

Discord ID: 629785803261870080


2019-10-04 21:02:05 UTC  

you're attributing more malice to this

2019-10-04 21:02:07 UTC  

it's not attack

2019-10-04 21:02:17 UTC  

They should have the liberty to live life without being attacked or beaten or however you want to term it

2019-10-04 21:02:19 UTC  

if someone actually attacks a child, yes, lock them up

2019-10-04 21:02:24 UTC  

basically. the smack (which should only be a slap on a safe area) is the final escalation. it's a "stop that, now" after attempting to ask nicely, reason, etc have failed.

2019-10-04 21:02:28 UTC  

@The Electric Lizard "forced to be attacked?" You're way off the reservation here

2019-10-04 21:02:40 UTC  

Well they are forced to stay with their parents

2019-10-04 21:02:40 UTC  

They shouldn't. @The Electric Lizard But the amount that do is very small, and there are already things in place to prevent this kinds of things.

2019-10-04 21:02:43 UTC  

"attacked", "beaten"

2019-10-04 21:02:44 UTC  

hmmm

2019-10-04 21:02:50 UTC  

looks like someone was raped as a kid

2019-10-04 21:02:56 UTC  

and doesn't understand normal parenting

2019-10-04 21:03:00 UTC  

It's called emotive language

2019-10-04 21:03:02 UTC  

Im not saying abuse children here, Im saying that if only absolutey necessary it needs to happen if the kid is just out of control.

2019-10-04 21:03:17 UTC  

yes, maybe you should separate your emotions

2019-10-04 21:03:21 UTC  

because they're over involved

2019-10-04 21:03:29 UTC  

Attacked generates a better emotional response then smacked

2019-10-04 21:03:29 UTC  

> think of the children

2019-10-04 21:03:42 UTC  

Think of the liberty of the child not to be smacked

2019-10-04 21:03:43 UTC  

thats because attacked is a different thing

2019-10-04 21:03:56 UTC  

yeah, so you're trying to stear the conversation and we're not accepting it

2019-10-04 21:04:03 UTC  

it's not attacking

2019-10-04 21:04:07 UTC  

it's not beating

2019-10-04 21:04:11 UTC  

these things are already illegal

2019-10-04 21:04:14 UTC  

A founding principle of Libertarianism is the Non-Aggression principle, Smacking a child breaks that

2019-10-04 21:04:28 UTC  

Well brothers play fighting one another creates chatacter and teaches them the reality of loosing and struggle

2019-10-04 21:04:29 UTC  

well fuck, better let the nazis take europe

2019-10-04 21:04:43 UTC  

smacking isnt aggression, its a communication, an instruction

2019-10-04 21:05:13 UTC  

if all aggression is unjustified then you're gonna die pretty fucking quickly in the desert when the lions get you

2019-10-04 21:05:23 UTC  

So if you go up to people and smack them, Can you claim that you were not actually attacking them you were just communicating with them? @system11

2019-10-04 21:05:34 UTC  

if my mother hadnt smacked me across the ass, i probably would have continued to refuse to go to school

2019-10-04 21:05:34 UTC  

Sometimes aggression in society is okay as well. Fuck absolutes like that.

2019-10-04 21:05:44 UTC  

@notaglobe No it's just unprovoked aggression

2019-10-04 21:06:01 UTC  

unprovoked

2019-10-04 21:06:04 UTC  

You dont want a generation of pussies

2019-10-04 21:06:06 UTC  

also not aggression

2019-10-04 21:06:08 UTC  

Smacking as a parental technique is unprovoked aggression as the child has not initiated it

2019-10-04 21:06:10 UTC  

for years she'd have been dealing with the reluctance, almost dragging me down the road

2019-10-04 21:06:26 UTC  

> as the child has not initiated it

This is incorrect

2019-10-04 21:06:28 UTC  

the child has initiated it - thats the whole point. its a reaction to an action

2019-10-04 21:06:35 UTC  

> unprovoked aggression
this is incorrect