Yep

Well they delayed judgement

LONDON (Reuters) - Scotland’s highest court said on Wednesday it would wait until Oct. 21 on whether to issue a ruling to force British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to abide by a law compelling him to seek a Brexit delay, a lawmaker involved in the case said.

Which is after the deadline for agreeing a deal or not

I think that him having an ally within that will refuse the extension is one of the most likely theories

The uk is still part of the EU.
It could use its own veto to block the extent

Don't think it can under the Benn act, HH

When is Benn getting deselected? Was he from a leave area?

dont think you are part of the extention comitee

so no veto for you

its EU27 for that one

also

https://twitter.com/ImIncorrigible/status/1181885181822717952?s=20

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

probably because it is being intentionally fucked up

Just doing my due diligence and checking suppliers brexit plans

"As for Brexit, the subsidiary expects a positive effect on its customers' and British exports due to weakening of the pound. "This is currently having a positive effect on our new orders," Radford adds."

Sounds good

https://www.balluff.com/local/gb/news/press-section/press-news/anniversary-in-great-britain/

And the stance hasn't changed since

What stops Boris from sending a letter that requests an extension but then lays out all of the ways in which he will make it very difficult for the EU to get anything done as a consequence if the extension is granted?

Doesn't that technically abide by the law?

It should
I think there's many things UK can't veto

a lot of stuff can pass with qualified majority, which is something like 2/3 of states with >60% of population

THere's far fewer things vetoable than there used to be

For Boris's post-extension threats to have any teeth requires him to be head of state post any election, which is unlikely

I think you are all going to have to come to terms with the likely outcome is an extension followed by a labour/libdem/snp government of death that destroys brexit and finishes off the country entirely

Time to get the fuck out of the cities, boys

That _might_ happen if labour ditches Corbyn

Doesn't require them to ditch Corbyn

Tories will haemorage seats in Scotland, parts of London, and the cretinous parts of the home counties. Their gains in North England will not make up for it

The electoral arithmetic is not adding up for them

All of the agregators are showing a majority, EMUK is showing a seat majority without DUP support and so is electoral calculus

All of the evidence we have so far is showing a tory victory even without a TBP pact

I think they're wrong

And you can think that

Their models aren't sophisticated enough

However all we have are these polls so I think youre wrong.

They're the same models that predicted a remain and Hilary victory

I don't care how much Cons loose, LibDems won't go into coalition with Corbynistas

They will