Message from @Headshots
Discord ID: 576433131998019584
1. We have seen that the value of the labouring power, or in more popular parlance, the value of labour, is determined by the value of necessaries, or the quantity of labour required to produce them.
If, then, in a given country the value of the daily average necessaries of the labourer represented six hours of labour expressed in 50 Dollars, the labourer would have to work six hours daily to produce an equivalent for this daily maintenance.
If the whole working day was twelve hours, the capitalist would pay him the value of his labour by paying him, say, $50
Half the working day would be unpaid labour, and the rate of profit would amount to 100 percent. But now suppose that, consequent upon a decrease of productivity, more labour should be wanted to produce, say, the same amount of agricultural produce, so that the price of the average daily necessaries should rise from fifty to 65 dollars
In that case the value of labour would rise by about one third, or 33 1/3 percent.
Eight hours of the working day would be required to produce an equivalent for the daily maintenance of the labourer, according to his old standard of living.
The surplus labour would therefore sink from six hours to four, and the rate of profit from 100 to 50 percent.
But in insisting upon a rise of wages, the labourer would only insist upon getting the increased value of his labour, like every other seller of a commodity, who, the costs of his commodities having increased, tries to get its increased value paid.
If wages did not rise, or not sufficiently rise, to compensate for the increased values of necessaries, the price of labour would sink below the *value* of labour, and the labourer's standard of life would deteriorate.
Hello, my dudes. Sorry for a blatant plug, but I've just finished my first zine called Amity Underground. The first issue is about the Alt-Right. You can find it on Scribd: https://www.scribd.com/book/409412898/Alt-Right-Inferno-Amity-Underground-1
Love how brony bitch is silent. Brony BTFO.
I am a woofmonster!
I am actually really immature
Also you should not call me brony bitch... Or
I might get a infatuation with you
You would not want to eradicate the moderators
Firefly is nice isn't he
Moderators
Communists want to eradicate the moderators!
what the fuck is shapiro doing
he got triggered mid interview
1/10 for NSDAP traitor symbol instead of the Hammer and Sword.
>Learning the true meaning about National Socialism
>Against racism
I think you mean Strasser.
lmao
When a atifa nig get's redpilled but not fully lol
this is so sad
ooga booga
this is why we should vote for classic socialism
(not modern socialism)
(..that is very gay)
We didn't vote because bourgeois democracy is a sham