Message from @Mros

Discord ID: 322586957681131520


2017-06-09 04:00:08 UTC  

Those same equations work for cosmology.

2017-06-09 04:00:14 UTC  

@Deleted User case and effect is just abstraction in your head. Reality is not broken in case and result

2017-06-09 04:00:39 UTC  

Reality is just a motion

2017-06-09 04:01:13 UTC  

I think materialism is correct about that, reality is just matter and motion.

2017-06-09 04:01:38 UTC  

If reality is just matter and motion then how could something exist beyond that?

2017-06-09 04:01:43 UTC  

There is no real difference between case and effect in reality

2017-06-09 04:02:01 UTC  

I apologize, I don't understand materialism too well myself.

2017-06-09 04:02:20 UTC  

Everything is case and everything is effect

2017-06-09 04:02:30 UTC  

If you break it into abstractions

2017-06-09 04:02:32 UTC  

That's the point. One effect is anothers cause is anothers effect etc.

2017-06-09 04:02:36 UTC  

It is just what it is

2017-06-09 04:03:03 UTC  

@Deleted User No, there is no effect. Effect is just in imagination.

2017-06-09 04:03:15 UTC  

What makes you think that, Firefly?

2017-06-09 04:03:50 UTC  

How do you know what motion is if you do not measure it?

2017-06-09 04:03:56 UTC  

it does not exist without an abstraction. If nobody to think about case it does not exist in abstraction.

2017-06-09 04:04:05 UTC  

I remind that Earth makes rotatory movements

2017-06-09 04:04:25 UTC  

and we don't ask if it's god anymore, right?

2017-06-09 04:04:39 UTC  

So reality is not broken into case and effect.

2017-06-09 04:04:43 UTC  

Reality is uniform

2017-06-09 04:04:54 UTC  

Free of abstraction

2017-06-09 04:05:24 UTC  

Blebleh I think you're assuming that if someone believes in a God they believe that everything is directly caused by him.

2017-06-09 04:05:24 UTC  

Abstraction is made by the brain only

2017-06-09 04:05:32 UTC  

How do you know that reality is uniform if you do not measure it? Is this another abstraction?

2017-06-09 04:05:49 UTC  

I don't reject that there could be a casuality for what we know; neither do I reject an infinite. The calification of instruments seems to me spooky

2017-06-09 04:06:08 UTC  

How is it wrong though?

2017-06-09 04:06:10 UTC  

@Deleted User You do not make abstractions in the place where they don't belong.

2017-06-09 04:06:19 UTC  

And it becomes uniform.

2017-06-09 04:06:30 UTC  

'Reality is uniform' I need to know more.

2017-06-09 04:06:36 UTC  

@Firefly can you recommend the book you read this from

2017-06-09 04:06:42 UTC  

Sounds interesting

2017-06-09 04:07:04 UTC  

@Deleted User Reality is not broken into things that people use to think.

2017-06-09 04:07:29 UTC  

People use abstractions because they give benefits.

2017-06-09 04:07:39 UTC  

Helping organize thought.

2017-06-09 04:08:44 UTC  

reality is not broken by abstractions itself. You need to use your brain to do that. So case is the creation of the brain

2017-06-09 04:09:01 UTC  

Nothing to do with universe

2017-06-09 04:09:06 UTC  

Or its existance

2017-06-09 04:09:33 UTC  

I think this argument of casuality can be used with God too

2017-06-09 04:09:37 UTC  

and so on

2017-06-09 04:09:38 UTC  

In an Absolute sense, reality is just totality, yes. But then it becomes impossible to say anything about it without using abstractions.

2017-06-09 04:09:38 UTC  

@Firefly Do you have a book list

2017-06-09 04:09:53 UTC  

why can't it be something natural?