Message from @Firefly

Discord ID: 322587523559849985


2017-06-09 04:03:15 UTC  

What makes you think that, Firefly?

2017-06-09 04:03:50 UTC  

How do you know what motion is if you do not measure it?

2017-06-09 04:03:56 UTC  

it does not exist without an abstraction. If nobody to think about case it does not exist in abstraction.

2017-06-09 04:04:05 UTC  

I remind that Earth makes rotatory movements

2017-06-09 04:04:25 UTC  

and we don't ask if it's god anymore, right?

2017-06-09 04:04:39 UTC  

So reality is not broken into case and effect.

2017-06-09 04:04:43 UTC  

Reality is uniform

2017-06-09 04:04:54 UTC  

Free of abstraction

2017-06-09 04:05:24 UTC  

Blebleh I think you're assuming that if someone believes in a God they believe that everything is directly caused by him.

2017-06-09 04:05:24 UTC  

Abstraction is made by the brain only

2017-06-09 04:05:32 UTC  

How do you know that reality is uniform if you do not measure it? Is this another abstraction?

2017-06-09 04:05:49 UTC  

I don't reject that there could be a casuality for what we know; neither do I reject an infinite. The calification of instruments seems to me spooky

2017-06-09 04:06:08 UTC  

How is it wrong though?

2017-06-09 04:06:10 UTC  

@Deleted User You do not make abstractions in the place where they don't belong.

2017-06-09 04:06:19 UTC  

And it becomes uniform.

2017-06-09 04:06:30 UTC  

'Reality is uniform' I need to know more.

2017-06-09 04:06:36 UTC  

@Firefly can you recommend the book you read this from

2017-06-09 04:06:42 UTC  

Sounds interesting

2017-06-09 04:07:04 UTC  

@Deleted User Reality is not broken into things that people use to think.

2017-06-09 04:07:29 UTC  

People use abstractions because they give benefits.

2017-06-09 04:07:39 UTC  

Helping organize thought.

2017-06-09 04:08:44 UTC  

reality is not broken by abstractions itself. You need to use your brain to do that. So case is the creation of the brain

2017-06-09 04:09:01 UTC  

Nothing to do with universe

2017-06-09 04:09:06 UTC  

Or its existance

2017-06-09 04:09:33 UTC  

I think this argument of casuality can be used with God too

2017-06-09 04:09:37 UTC  

and so on

2017-06-09 04:09:38 UTC  

In an Absolute sense, reality is just totality, yes. But then it becomes impossible to say anything about it without using abstractions.

2017-06-09 04:09:38 UTC  

@Firefly Do you have a book list

2017-06-09 04:09:53 UTC  

why can't it be something natural?

2017-06-09 04:09:54 UTC  

If something had to move God then the first mover cannot be God.

2017-06-09 04:10:06 UTC  

Is it that difficult to understand?

2017-06-09 04:10:08 UTC  

Tengri is natural

2017-06-09 04:10:24 UTC  

@Deleted User yes, but it is not reality that follow abstractions. It is abstractions that follow reality. And in the case of first mover is opposite.

2017-06-09 04:10:44 UTC  

then god would be the father of who created us?

2017-06-09 04:10:48 UTC  

Such is the nature of all theory.

2017-06-09 04:11:03 UTC  

We can never reach an Absolute understanding of reality.

2017-06-09 04:11:19 UTC  

God is the father of everything. The First mover.

2017-06-09 04:11:58 UTC  

Thanks

2017-06-09 04:12:01 UTC  

ok then we could find the origin of our universe and still ask for who created it and so on

2017-06-09 04:12:06 UTC  

until there's nothing