Can't think of a better way to measure intelligence

IQ is less than ideal for measuring individual intelligence, but it's a pretty good vague indicator.

Are u on dumb

The two big tests have been tested thousands of times

And are verifiable

What are you trying to get at?

Weachler and Stanford benet

That they aren't as vague as you're describing

Stephen Hawking "only" has an IQ of 160. Far from the record of 230.

Are you

.

I just tend to find that a bunch of people could say your not that smart, or at least aren't sure you'll succeed, and then despite everything, you could succeed top of the class.

That's a children's IQ test that goes above 145

It's purely theoretical

The only two verifiable tests are weschler 5 and Stanford benet

All others are theoretical or not fully proven

high IQ isn't a key to success, you can fail with it and succeed without it

I've never taken an IQ Test but I suspect it would be around 140

Exactly

But generally high IQ means you succeed more often

It's a test of potential

It's potential intelligence

And lmao 140

Again, IQ is useful for broad statistical purposes. Perhaps not as useful or accurate on the individual.

That's autism levels

You're equating autism with intelligence?

You're wrong though, it was made for individuals

HFA

Not specifically autism

ASD*

lol time for me to yeet out of this conversation

"autism is intelligence"

HFA is literally that

Autism can be very debilitating. I would expect it would often suggest lower IQ for many.

You moron

HFA means

asspergers can be very helpful with intelligence

High functioning

High focus

Which by definition

Is higher than 70