Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 339443869668343818
They can change with age, but they are adjusted to be the same at every age if your intelligence remains constant.
When China invests in a country, they build a Chinese tenement building and send Chinese men to work there. It's very rare they don't do this.
Doesn't change the fact that third worlders are stupid af
Can't think of a better way to measure intelligence
IQ is less than ideal for measuring individual intelligence, but it's a pretty good vague indicator.
Are u on dumb
The two big tests have been tested thousands of times
And are verifiable
What are you trying to get at?
Weachler and Stanford benet
That they aren't as vague as you're describing
Stephen Hawking "only" has an IQ of 160. Far from the record of 230.
Are you
.
I just tend to find that a bunch of people could say your not that smart, or at least aren't sure you'll succeed, and then despite everything, you could succeed top of the class.
That's a children's IQ test that goes above 145
It's purely theoretical
The only two verifiable tests are weschler 5 and Stanford benet
All others are theoretical or not fully proven
high IQ isn't a key to success, you can fail with it and succeed without it
Exactly
But generally high IQ means you succeed more often
It's a test of potential
It's potential intelligence
And lmao 140
Again, IQ is useful for broad statistical purposes. Perhaps not as useful or accurate on the individual.
That's autism levels
You're equating autism with intelligence?
You're wrong though, it was made for individuals
HFA
Not specifically autism
ASD*
lol time for me to yeet out of this conversation
"autism is intelligence"
HFA is literally that
Autism can be very debilitating. I would expect it would often suggest lower IQ for many.
You moron
HFA means
asspergers can be very helpful with intelligence
High functioning