Message from @Raymond
Discord ID: 339693512381431808
^
I guess I will have to push the example in order to stop you from squirming.
1. An foreign power is launching a full invasion on your nation. What is your response, and what do you do when counterattacks leads to new lands, do you accept them or surrender them back to old borders?
2. What is the motivation of a fascist society after it destroys its own internal enemies? How does it transfer into an active power of freeing the people into a passive power of defending the people, what does that look like, and how will it balance against future external threats that relate to (1)?
I don't see why it should be any different than it is now
1. Divide their country into smaller states if they're already ethnically divided or turn them into a protectorate
1. So you accept an expansionist policy where it is convenient?
If it benefits the state, sure. But as a rule I don't believe we should seek out war.
I really, really want to clarity, but I had to formulate my questions into a small a words as possible unless you handwave me.
If another power engages in war with us and we win, the sensible approach would be to hinder them from doing it again.
1. So, following this pattern of conquest, it is possible that the whole globe would come under your power?
1. Well, nobody advocated for the seizure of land
1. And this is only in response to another nation declaring war, not actively seeking to promote it
Why would an ethno state be more at war than say a current state?
^
1. Where there are differences there are conflicts. Given enough time, this escalates. You have to be willing to defend your own? Therefore it opens up into conflict, given enough time. And if you are successful, your borders or effective influence expands.
Well, actually I am saying that if you take over the world, then what.
What do you mean, then what?
A global empire is not stable.
A nations sole responsibility isn't to conquer others
It's to look after it's people
Then we get all space & techy and start cucc'ing aliens
an Ethnostate would do exactly that
Pretty soon masterchief is born
@Deleted User gotta admire your persistence
@Deleted User he's been arguing for hours though
People like you guys are the reason why we will never be star trek
Humanity will never touch the stars
an Ethnostate wouldn't necessarily seek to become a global empire
We'll stagnate and wither away on this planet
Fuck you
and probably would need to remove other ethnicities to make that possible
or at least races
It's in the name Ethno state
So here is the end game, you have dominium in some form over the globe, conflicts still exist, because they are built on the fascist model, which is 'look out for your own'. People's differences always exist, so there will always be conflict, under this model.
Can't wait for the world to end just so ugly dyke cunts like these won't be able to exist anymore
Look out for your own, meaning your own people
WHAT ARE THOOOOOSE?!
an ethnostate wouldn't have a dominion as such, or at least would remove the other ethnicites which would remove difference and thus conflict
would be removed as well
that is only if an ethnostates goal was world domination
There will always be different and conflict. Every state was an ethnostate at one point and those were even more violent times. We actually live in an age of peace.