But then who will prep the bull while they're at the computer

>ethno fascist
>I willingly ignore the rest of the world and hope they don't hurt me

In case you don't realise.

Sure. Even a friendly conversation.

I have some questions.

Anarchist.

ethno fascism doesn't mean zero interaction with other nationstates

^

1. What do you do about foreign agressive powers?
2. How would a successful Fascist power transfer from a focus on fighting its enemies when all the enemies are defeated? Does it manufacture it's own or declare war against itself?

You're again assuming a fascist state must declare war on other states to survive

^

I guess I will have to push the example in order to stop you from squirming.
1. An foreign power is launching a full invasion on your nation. What is your response, and what do you do when counterattacks leads to new lands, do you accept them or surrender them back to old borders?
2. What is the motivation of a fascist society after it destroys its own internal enemies? How does it transfer into an active power of freeing the people into a passive power of defending the people, what does that look like, and how will it balance against future external threats that relate to (1)?

I don't see why it should be any different than it is now

1. Divide their country into smaller states if they're already ethnically divided or turn them into a protectorate

1. So you accept an expansionist policy where it is convenient?

If it benefits the state, sure. But as a rule I don't believe we should seek out war.

I really, really want to clarity, but I had to formulate my questions into a small a words as possible unless you handwave me.

If another power engages in war with us and we win, the sensible approach would be to hinder them from doing it again.

1. So, following this pattern of conquest, it is possible that the whole globe would come under your power?

1. Well, nobody advocated for the seizure of land

1. And this is only in response to another nation declaring war, not actively seeking to promote it

Why would an ethno state be more at war than say a current state?

^

1. Where there are differences there are conflicts. Given enough time, this escalates. You have to be willing to defend your own? Therefore it opens up into conflict, given enough time. And if you are successful, your borders or effective influence expands.

Well, actually I am saying that if you take over the world, then what.

What do you mean, then what?

A global empire is not stable.

A nations sole responsibility isn't to conquer others

It's to look after it's people

Then we get all space & techy and start cucc'ing aliens

Lol they're still at it

an Ethnostate would do exactly that

Pretty soon masterchief is born

@Deleted User gotta admire your persistence

@Deleted User he's been arguing for hours though

People like you guys are the reason why we will never be star trek

Humanity will never touch the stars

an Ethnostate wouldn't necessarily seek to become a global empire

We'll stagnate and wither away on this planet

Fuck you

and probably would need to remove other ethnicities to make that possible