Well, actually I am saying that if you take over the world, then what.

What do you mean, then what?

A global empire is not stable.

A nations sole responsibility isn't to conquer others

It's to look after it's people

Then we get all space & techy and start cucc'ing aliens

Lol they're still at it

an Ethnostate would do exactly that

Pretty soon masterchief is born

@Deleted User gotta admire your persistence

@Deleted User he's been arguing for hours though

People like you guys are the reason why we will never be star trek

Humanity will never touch the stars

an Ethnostate wouldn't necessarily seek to become a global empire

We'll stagnate and wither away on this planet

Fuck you

and probably would need to remove other ethnicities to make that possible

or at least races

It's in the name Ethno state

So here is the end game, you have dominium in some form over the globe, conflicts still exist, because they are built on the fascist model, which is 'look out for your own'. People's differences always exist, so there will always be conflict, under this model.

Can't wait for the world to end just so ugly dyke cunts like these won't be able to exist anymore

Look out for your own, meaning your own people

WHAT ARE THOOOOOSE?!

an ethnostate wouldn't have a dominion as such, or at least would remove the other ethnicites which would remove difference and thus conflict

would be removed as well

that is only if an ethnostates goal was world domination

There will always be different and conflict. Every state was an ethnostate at one point and those were even more violent times. We actually live in an age of peace.

Which I think normally an ethnostate is quite isolationist

Statistically

People will never run out of shit to kill each other over

@Deleted User Many things have changed then, not just the fact that ethnostates no longer reside in the western world..

Until we evolve significantly or transhumanism becomes a thing

Whichever comes first

Most likely neither

Organisations have formed solely to stop war in the world

There is always a conflict against time. Given that evolution has mutations and given relative location, differences develop. No matter how much you assume a singular identity, there will be difference that emerge in the future via mutations, and they will change these differences into conflict. Enthnocentrism is not an answer to the next level of human develop, because it harbours antagonisms.

@Deleted User You mean shit has changed over the last several centuries?

Srs???

No fucken way dude

woah

You imply that ethnostates are the sole reason for the enormous amounts of war in the past centuries