Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 352973149123510292
Warlords take over and fuck shit up, maybe a few massacres, maybe the occasional revolution
Anarchy is the opposite of a spook. It is defined as a negative.
we need a base population so that we may choose a form of government and appoint leaders. Would you be interested in joining? pm me
Depends on your definition
Can we choose no government?
It's both as political state and a synonym for chaos
@Deleted User how would that make anything different
it's not like people are all going to live on their own tiny little properties anyways, at least not long term
Of course not. I hope they don't. Anarchy is the destruction of hierarchy and dominance. No private property.
as soon as major landlords start building their own "micro-countries" on which you pay them taxes, you're living in an authoritarian state
@Deleted User Check ur pms
So you fight them as well.
you don't fight them, they just bought your land
why would you fight them
Anarchy just keeps on giving. Bought? I just said I don't believe in private property.
someone's gotta build roads and enforce public order
you're gonna pay someone taxes to do it, whether it's your government or your landlord
Um, no.
so you're an anarcho-primitivist then?
no roads, no police, just the laws of nature?
No. What kind of dichotomy is this? And yes, but co-operation is still possible, as it suits individuals to do so.
OOGA BOOGA
TECHNOLOGY BAD
Roads, maybe. Police, no way. Laws of nature, always. But individuals can be altruistic also.
Hello, I am making a nation-themed discord server. Presently, we need a base population so that we may choose a form of government and appoint leaders. Would you be interested in joining? pm me
Stop spamming, piglet.
It's called DM, not PM.
What kind of reactionary always associates freedom with badness? You're in no position to enforce such a claim.
Because humans are imperfect and there are too many of us.
Humans are perfect and there are not enough of us.
It's impossible to achieve such a system without mass casualties
It's not a 'system', it's the absence of it.
"impossible" well more like "unlikely"
Also if you cared about the human race. Anarchy is definitely not the way to go.
And you are the caretaker of humanity? Such a bold claim. Can I see some credentials please?
I am God
You would make an excellent Anarchist.
*Dog