@Valtiel Yeah but they don't put anything in place that fixes irt

That's because they are dumb af

Warlords take over and fuck shit up, maybe a few massacres, maybe the occasional revolution

Anarchy is the opposite of a spook. It is defined as a negative.

we need a base population so that we may choose a form of government and appoint leaders. Would you be interested in joining? pm me

Depends on your definition

Can we choose no government?

It's both as political state and a synonym for chaos

@Deleted User how would that make anything different

it's not like people are all going to live on their own tiny little properties anyways, at least not long term

Of course not. I hope they don't. Anarchy is the destruction of hierarchy and dominance. No private property.

as soon as major landlords start building their own "micro-countries" on which you pay them taxes, you're living in an authoritarian state

@Deleted User Check ur pms

So you fight them as well.

you don't fight them, they just bought your land

why would you fight them

Anarchy just keeps on giving. Bought? I just said I don't believe in private property.

someone's gotta build roads and enforce public order

you're gonna pay someone taxes to do it, whether it's your government or your landlord

Um, no.

so you're an anarcho-primitivist then?

no roads, no police, just the laws of nature?

No. What kind of dichotomy is this? And yes, but co-operation is still possible, as it suits individuals to do so.

OOGA BOOGA

TECHNOLOGY BAD

Roads, maybe. Police, no way. Laws of nature, always. But individuals can be altruistic also.

Hello, I am making a nation-themed discord server. Presently, we need a base population so that we may choose a form of government and appoint leaders. Would you be interested in joining? pm me

Stop spamming, piglet.

It's called DM, not PM.

What kind of reactionary always associates freedom with badness? You're in no position to enforce such a claim.

Because humans are imperfect and there are too many of us.

Humans are perfect and there are not enough of us.

It's impossible to achieve such a system without mass casualties

It's not a 'system', it's the absence of it.

"impossible" well more like "unlikely"

Also if you cared about the human race. Anarchy is definitely not the way to go.

And you are the caretaker of humanity? Such a bold claim. Can I see some credentials please?

I am God