Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 352972080536354828


2017-09-01 00:21:36 UTC  

Social liberal republic

2017-09-01 00:21:40 UTC  

Anarchy is a transient state and if it somehow stabilizes, life isn't much different from living with a government, except everything is being decided with money.

2017-09-01 00:21:58 UTC  

How about an organic state where you switch out systems

2017-09-01 00:22:02 UTC  

Depending on necessity

2017-09-01 00:22:08 UTC  

So when one system fails it gets replaced

2017-09-01 00:22:14 UTC  

That happens all the time in Africa kek

2017-09-01 00:22:21 UTC  

(risky investment there's no telling how future generations would fuck it up!)

2017-09-01 00:22:40 UTC  

@Valtiel Africans switch out systems based on how they're feeling I'm talking need

2017-09-01 00:22:40 UTC  

That would be such a shitty place to live in

2017-09-01 00:22:59 UTC  

this is why the ideal democracy allows the people to remove the democracy when they no longer need it

2017-09-01 00:23:09 UTC  

>Anarchy
>Private property
Uh, no sweetie.

2017-09-01 00:23:11 UTC  

@Deleted User how they feel. Starving and dying of disease. I would say that's a need

2017-09-01 00:23:18 UTC  

@Deleted User Anarchy is a spook

2017-09-01 00:23:36 UTC  

@Valtiel Yeah but they don't put anything in place that fixes irt

2017-09-01 00:23:47 UTC  

That's because they are dumb af

2017-09-01 00:23:51 UTC  

Warlords take over and fuck shit up, maybe a few massacres, maybe the occasional revolution

2017-09-01 00:23:54 UTC  

Anarchy is the opposite of a spook. It is defined as a negative.

2017-09-01 00:24:16 UTC  

we need a base population so that we may choose a form of government and appoint leaders. Would you be interested in joining? pm me

2017-09-01 00:24:47 UTC  

Depends on your definition

2017-09-01 00:24:58 UTC  

Can we choose no government?

2017-09-01 00:25:01 UTC  

It's both as political state and a synonym for chaos

2017-09-01 00:25:21 UTC  

@Deleted User how would that make anything different

2017-09-01 00:25:45 UTC  

it's not like people are all going to live on their own tiny little properties anyways, at least not long term

2017-09-01 00:26:27 UTC  

Of course not. I hope they don't. Anarchy is the destruction of hierarchy and dominance. No private property.

2017-09-01 00:26:56 UTC  

as soon as major landlords start building their own "micro-countries" on which you pay them taxes, you're living in an authoritarian state

2017-09-01 00:27:03 UTC  

@Deleted User Check ur pms

2017-09-01 00:27:16 UTC  

So you fight them as well.

2017-09-01 00:27:28 UTC  

you don't fight them, they just bought your land

2017-09-01 00:27:35 UTC  

why would you fight them

2017-09-01 00:27:45 UTC  

Anarchy just keeps on giving. Bought? I just said I don't believe in private property.

2017-09-01 00:27:50 UTC  

someone's gotta build roads and enforce public order

2017-09-01 00:28:12 UTC  

you're gonna pay someone taxes to do it, whether it's your government or your landlord

2017-09-01 00:28:23 UTC  

Um, no.

2017-09-01 00:28:37 UTC  

so you're an anarcho-primitivist then?

2017-09-01 00:28:50 UTC  

no roads, no police, just the laws of nature?

2017-09-01 00:29:16 UTC  

No. What kind of dichotomy is this? And yes, but co-operation is still possible, as it suits individuals to do so.

2017-09-01 00:29:20 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/352973164424200193/pol_pot_meme.jpg

2017-09-01 00:29:35 UTC  

OOGA BOOGA

2017-09-01 00:29:49 UTC  

TECHNOLOGY BAD

2017-09-01 00:30:52 UTC  

Roads, maybe. Police, no way. Laws of nature, always. But individuals can be altruistic also.

2017-09-01 00:31:48 UTC  

Hello, I am making a nation-themed discord server. Presently, we need a base population so that we may choose a form of government and appoint leaders. Would you be interested in joining? pm me