Message from @Dargon
Discord ID: 354128414623531028
no because anarchism has its own principles
being anti-authoritarian also means being anti-genocide
You cannot expect each other to all get in a big circle and hold hands and sing kumbiah, people are always going to wage war against each other.
well national anarchism is a thing
What an oxymoron.
its just anarchism within a fixed set of boundaries
where people can seperate along lines or race, etc
I'm not a national anarchist ofc
**BOUNDARIES?! THAT IS A VIOLATION OF THE
NON
AGRESSION
PRINCIPLE
AND MUST BE SHUT DOWN **
If you remove the underlying conditions that motivate mass conflict, it wouldn't take place
Not that kind of anarchist dude
Ancaps are morons
I'm more of a left-com
with ancom tendencies
"Leftcom"
Nuke the muke
But when you remove all power from authority and force them to please everybody unless it shudders and falls apart, then you cannot expect anybody to follow any rules, that is unless people start enforcing laws and policies.
You cannot expect people to just take up arms and magically fight for the same side just because there is authority.
@Deleted User Are you saying that the only reason people are nice to each other is through coercion from the government?
@Wilhelm Zaisser#5032 No, but because the governments enforce laws and policies, it keeps people from preforming some pretty nasty and most likley dead stuff.
@Deleted User But currently the government (state) has a monopoly on violence. It's not as if people wouldn't take their own precautions if they were allowed to.
Governments don't enforce laws, the judiciary does.
Seperation of powers.
@Wilhelm Zaisser#5032 And that is not to say that communities would not usurp the monopoly on violence?
@Deleted User Communities trend towards stability, similar to how societies functioned before modern governments.
Societies were extremely violent before modern governments, are you saying that feudalism was less violent and more harmonious?
Not sure what you mean with 'extremely violent'. Stable societies cannot be extremely violent. Believe it or not, people don't like being raped and murdered.
>Believing societies before now were way violent
There was always violence in past societies, don't tell me that any society was less violent than society is now, because they were always more violent.
That's hilarious and very vague.
Even before civilization was developed, humans were much more violent.
How in any way was society more violent now?
What are you even comparing it to? Also it seems like violence may be apart of how a society is stabilised.
How so?
Suppose combat sports is a way to sublimate aggression and turn violent instincts intoa controlled environment. That could be a net gain for stability.
@Wilhelm Zaisser#5032 >Greek society
>Doubt is casted over their lack of wars
>We have not even translated their language
Or suppose that there is a degree of natural selection and some violence adds to it.
And what are you even comparing it to. What is the golden example of peace in today's world, and if it is a first world country, what about the rest of the world upon which the first world is rested upon?
And an island that only 330K people live on and was not lived on by humans until the vikings made a small settlement on it.