Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 354126472627355659
most anarchists aren't opposed to the law
they're just opposed to the current laws
But what if people refuse to listen to their orders? Because coercion would not be allowed, then people would be free to not have to listen to any rules.
in an anarchist society there wouldn't be any authority to enforce laws, laws would be collectively enforced
yes
>Collectively enforced
By whom?
the peeps
Thats right people would be free to not listen to any rules
as long as they aren't harming others
What if a gang of people collectively decide to commit mass murder and rape on a village? Would that be considered collective enforcement of their policies?
they they're harming others
any society can act in self defense
>implying bourgeois government isn't already a criminal organisation
they're also betraying anarchist principles
Dante went full anarchist
"Muh evil State"
although I don't see why a group would want to commit genocide agaisnt another ubder anarchism
@Railing No shit, any society can act in self defense, but dosen't the core principles of anarchism make them valid if what they believing they are doing is just and fair in their eyes?
no because anarchism has its own principles
being anti-authoritarian also means being anti-genocide
You cannot expect each other to all get in a big circle and hold hands and sing kumbiah, people are always going to wage war against each other.
well national anarchism is a thing
What an oxymoron.
its just anarchism within a fixed set of boundaries
where people can seperate along lines or race, etc
I'm not a national anarchist ofc
**BOUNDARIES?! THAT IS A VIOLATION OF THE
NON
AGRESSION
PRINCIPLE
AND MUST BE SHUT DOWN **
If you remove the underlying conditions that motivate mass conflict, it wouldn't take place
Not that kind of anarchist dude
Ancaps are morons
I'm more of a left-com
with ancom tendencies
"Leftcom"
Nuke the muke
But when you remove all power from authority and force them to please everybody unless it shudders and falls apart, then you cannot expect anybody to follow any rules, that is unless people start enforcing laws and policies.
You cannot expect people to just take up arms and magically fight for the same side just because there is authority.
@Deleted User Are you saying that the only reason people are nice to each other is through coercion from the government?
@Wilhelm Zaisser#5032 No, but because the governments enforce laws and policies, it keeps people from preforming some pretty nasty and most likley dead stuff.
@Deleted User But currently the government (state) has a monopoly on violence. It's not as if people wouldn't take their own precautions if they were allowed to.
Governments don't enforce laws, the judiciary does.