of the people inhabiting the land of the government

imagine

if there was an anarchist society

so

this means

no coherent military

no military funding or construction

now

if said society gets invaded

they are screwed

they cant produce enough to counter the enemy

actually

they could not produce at all

Anarchism is not a society or a system, it is just the negation of systems. People are free to achieve and cooperate much more than a petty government instruction.

yes

but having that eliminates the possibility of a military

due to a military is a government upon itself

Military is just like government. The status quo in social relations.

yes

so a military is effectively impossible in an anarchy

In the traditional sense, of course.

is there a non traditional sense?

Raiders.

Offence vs defence remember?

yes

but raiders are unorganized

And I still want to ask you, defence of what? Private property.

no defence of lives

People are property of the ruling class.

and ability to support the people

Slavery.

yes

but this is authoritarianism

no upper class

So in a sense government is the reaction against raiders to defend property of labour.

yes.

Well, I am of the eternal raider camp.

I think property is based on a fake idea.

why?

property is value

it is worth trade