Message from @reedpopper

Discord ID: 374282029317095433


2017-10-29 19:39:56 UTC  

It is a concept

2017-10-29 19:40:00 UTC  

oh my god

2017-10-29 19:40:07 UTC  

You're braindead

2017-10-29 19:40:19 UTC  

the dichotomy you talk about does not exist

2017-10-29 19:40:39 UTC  

do you realize that symbols are as material as the other concrete things they designate

2017-10-29 19:40:40 UTC  

It doesn't exist because you've been hopped up on theoretical writings rather than common sense

2017-10-29 19:40:53 UTC  

Symbols transcribed into material

2017-10-29 19:41:05 UTC  

ask any man on the street and they'll tell you that numbers are things written on a paper or a computer lmao

2017-10-29 19:41:09 UTC  

how's that not common sense

2017-10-29 19:41:09 UTC  

If you make a symbol out of materials, then that symbol is then represented in a material form

2017-10-29 19:41:23 UTC  

Ultimately the very concept or thought of the symbol lies not in the material world

2017-10-29 19:41:44 UTC  

The text formed on your screen is material

2017-10-29 19:41:44 UTC  

jfc

2017-10-29 19:41:49 UTC  

materialist philosophy: talks about physical material in the world we are experiencing, eg something that is real
immaterial philosophy: talks about concepts about things that do not actually exist in the world like God or other imaginary probabilities

2017-10-29 19:42:02 UTC  

What the text means is not formed on the screen

2017-10-29 19:42:05 UTC  

numbers that you imagine in your brain lie in the material world bc by definition they're in your head

2017-10-29 19:42:12 UTC  

@big fat memes >not being both

2017-10-29 19:42:17 UTC  

What do you not understand

2017-10-29 19:42:21 UTC  

Where is the disconnect

2017-10-29 19:42:59 UTC  

the disconnect is that numbers for example are symbols which can be found in the material world and they designate material things

2017-10-29 19:43:09 UTC  

so they cannot be immaterial

2017-10-29 19:43:16 UTC  

there is no such dichotomy

2017-10-29 19:43:19 UTC  

@reedpopper They are but they are not, the interaction of your brain matter to create the thought is material, but the concept they formulate is based off of something that would exist even without your brain

2017-10-29 19:43:25 UTC  

Therefore the concept is not material

2017-10-29 19:43:32 UTC  

everything you can talk about or refer to exists within the scope of experience

2017-10-29 19:43:42 UTC  

Or do you intend to contend that they are simply translations from other parts of the material world?

2017-10-29 19:43:49 UTC  

how would numbers exist without me thinking of them

2017-10-29 19:44:07 UTC  

@Deleted User We can experience these numbers because they are symbology of material measurements

We do not experience God because there is no physical proof of him existing, therefore this is an immaterial philosophy

2017-10-29 19:44:15 UTC  

They most certainly CAN be immaterial, they have a relation with materials but they are not material

2017-10-29 19:44:31 UTC  

They do not cease existing if the material they are translated onto ceases existing

2017-10-29 19:44:34 UTC  

Simply

2017-10-29 19:44:42 UTC  

If the world stopped existing numbers wouldn't

2017-10-29 19:45:04 UTC  

what level of mental gymnastics is this

2017-10-29 19:45:20 UTC  

if the universe stopped existing, numbers would stop existing

2017-10-29 19:45:30 UTC  

Less that what you go through to justify your delusion

2017-10-29 19:45:31 UTC  

the world is not the universe

2017-10-29 19:45:40 UTC  

i see we're not getting anywhere with this

2017-10-29 19:45:42 UTC  

If the universe stopped existing, numbers would still exist

2017-10-29 19:45:44 UTC  

let us move on from numbers then

2017-10-29 19:45:49 UTC  

and take another example

2017-10-29 19:45:50 UTC  

They would lose their function but they would not cease being