Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 389709794329624576
after the stole our tech with spies
and we had them in the late 40s
they wouldn't have done it in time
late 40s
no
we bombed japan in 45
there was extensive testing prior to
ok mid 40s
ill correct myself
5 years in a nuclear war where only one side has them is a lot of time
ya know because no spying wouldve taken place
surely
@bobdebuilder MacArthur would not have been able to take on the USSR. And the US benefited more from Soviet involvement in the war when you take into consideration the fact that most of the fighting took place between the Red Army and the Germans. In fact, a number of scholars have suggested that the Red Army may have been able to defeat the Germans without help from the US military.
espicially not during war time
and its not like the red army was huge
and a number of AMERICANS would defect
obviously the us benefited our only plan was to stop the germans
bringing guns
they figured russia could help if they had more cash flow and it worked
if they would have flipped and blown russia out there wouldn't have been a cold war
and russia was capitalist
then the USA would probably not exist by that point
heh
capitalism is the only reason the us had the resources to fund the war in the first place
if i have 1 million soldiers with no guns
and you have 1 soldier with gun whos gonna win
socialism creates low economic growth
doesn't matter "nuke"
lol
you die to
loll
technology is a big factor in war
Capitalo-imperialism* and the systematic plundering of resource-rich countries in the tireless pursuit of ever-greater profits.
the russians in 1945 had no mechanism to defeat a the us if nukes were to be employed
by the 50s they wouldve won
they wouldn't have been on the map at that point
i don't know how you don't see that
no im saying if the war started in the 50s-60s the soviets wouldve won
okay yeah if the us would have taken a break then it would have been fair? lol wtf
the us in the 1950s still had more warpower than the russians did