lol

maybe enough for a few guns or something

not enough to feed stalingrad

consider how much of that got destroyed in transport

consider how big the ussr is

if you don't think they benefited by the americans taking their side you are crazy

i do i jus think the numbers are way off

and its exaggerated

mcaurther wanted to destroy russia and could have done so

and america would be destroyed to

instead we sent a ton of money and stopped half way through germany

wtf lol

we would have demolished the russians

guerilla warfare

"nukes"

who had those in the 40s

they built thier own evuantually

eventually

they had them by the 50s

early

after the stole our tech with spies

and we had them in the late 40s

they wouldn't have done it in time

late 40s

no

we bombed japan in 45

there was extensive testing prior to

ok mid 40s

ill correct myself

5 years in a nuclear war where only one side has them is a lot of time

ya know because no spying wouldve taken place

surely

@bobdebuilder MacArthur would not have been able to take on the USSR. And the US benefited more from Soviet involvement in the war when you take into consideration the fact that most of the fighting took place between the Red Army and the Germans. In fact, a number of scholars have suggested that the Red Army may have been able to defeat the Germans without help from the US military.

espicially not during war time

and its not like the red army was huge

and a number of AMERICANS would defect

obviously the us benefited our only plan was to stop the germans

bringing guns

they figured russia could help if they had more cash flow and it worked

if they would have flipped and blown russia out there wouldn't have been a cold war

ok what would the world be like if the usa was the socialist one