Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 389709454754709504
we would have demolished the russians
guerilla warfare
"nukes"
who had those in the 40s
they built thier own evuantually
eventually
they had them by the 50s
early
after the stole our tech with spies
and we had them in the late 40s
they wouldn't have done it in time
late 40s
no
we bombed japan in 45
there was extensive testing prior to
ok mid 40s
ill correct myself
5 years in a nuclear war where only one side has them is a lot of time
ya know because no spying wouldve taken place
surely
@bobdebuilder MacArthur would not have been able to take on the USSR. And the US benefited more from Soviet involvement in the war when you take into consideration the fact that most of the fighting took place between the Red Army and the Germans. In fact, a number of scholars have suggested that the Red Army may have been able to defeat the Germans without help from the US military.
espicially not during war time
and its not like the red army was huge
and a number of AMERICANS would defect
obviously the us benefited our only plan was to stop the germans
bringing guns
they figured russia could help if they had more cash flow and it worked
if they would have flipped and blown russia out there wouldn't have been a cold war
ok what would the world be like if the usa was the socialist one
and russia was capitalist
then the USA would probably not exist by that point
heh
capitalism is the only reason the us had the resources to fund the war in the first place
if i have 1 million soldiers with no guns
and you have 1 soldier with gun whos gonna win
socialism creates low economic growth
doesn't matter "nuke"
lol
you die to
loll
technology is a big factor in war