Guy seems to be an alt-right ethnonationalist type like Spencer but actually smart.
I'll try finding time to read up on your heroes, I would rather get some programming projects out the way first.

I like how they consistently referenced communism in their debate simply by saying "Its good in theory but doesn't work"

As if they'd even cracked open the theory to begin with

Life is also good in theory but does not work

It's that Korean guy who loves death

And aren't still under the impression people don't keep their toothbrushes

_quick hide your cell phone, they'll *totally* try and redistribute it!_

Fuckin shenanigans :l

Kek, well the idea of wealth redistribution is fucking retarded because the second you start buying things for yourself, the idea of having it taken off you "for the greater good" is extremely undesirable.

So you'll get nearly no cooperation from people who don't believe in "the greater good" and want to support their families to give them the best life possible.

Hence why it isn't an option, and hence why it's not literally taking sums of money from one person to give to another person, plus that doesn't solve shit if the money is still allowed to be concentrated back into power centers

There isn't some national tip jar that gets passed around by armed guards

Its things like capital

That get redistributed.

Not things like

But capital in and of itself

So you want to start stealing people's money from them?

You mean in the same way they have money stolen from their labor?

You're gonna start whining about CEOs taking home large pay packets, aren't you?

Or bankers taking home huge amounts of retirement money

Not about large or small pay packets

Its pay at all

The need for a middle man is nonexistent

You want to abolish money

If the resources exist,

And people want to apply their labour to use those resources to make a living, or a good, or what have

You

They should do so

You want to build a society on barter?

As they did through the entirety of human society

Before capital

It was only until violent enclosure that you needed a CEO getting paid to sell yourself to make a living

You are trying to make a case for society to be built on barter

Gift economy is just yet another mode of distribution, you obviously don't need to haul around the tangible goods

You can have a medium of exchange that doesn't entail a market

Its not like I'm asking people to trade horses or couches

So calling it a barter or implying such a thing is meh

Whether it's barter or not, I think we both know I mean making goods for the sake of the goods themselves,

Not the wage to then go buy goods

Barter is the direct trade of goods and services without the use of money.
You essentially want to end the entire finance industry because you think money is bad. And you want to replace what is used to help set a standard of relative value between goods with nothing.

Read what I said above