He wasn't saying that's how reality is

He's saying reality should be close to that

But Spencer wanted to feel powerful about calling people autistic and saying he lives in "reality where states have control over people"

@Cam Sargon does that with everyone. Although somehow a leftist YouTuber managed to help him understand the difference between private and personal property

Sargon's entire scope seems to be free access to porn and vidya and being able to say mean things online without police at his door.

And ramble on about "white people knowing other white people"

Cause he's also an illegitimate cow

Mooooo

As I said, alt-right mocks the shit out of Spencer. Someone like Mike Enoch may be better to talk to about the alt-right, since I listened to Mike Enoch's response to Sargon's questions for the alt-right and actually seemed to know what he was talking about.

Yea idfk who that is

I'll figure it out later

I didn't until a couple days ago.

But if they talk about ethnostates I'm 100% positive it's going to be retarded

Fine I'll read into them if you read more into Marx. Then we'll have nice happy intellectual exchange. Sound good? @Cam

Daily reminder that the yellow century is soon upon us

Guy seems to be an alt-right ethnonationalist type like Spencer but actually smart.
I'll try finding time to read up on your heroes, I would rather get some programming projects out the way first.

I like how they consistently referenced communism in their debate simply by saying "Its good in theory but doesn't work"

As if they'd even cracked open the theory to begin with

Life is also good in theory but does not work

It's that Korean guy who loves death

And aren't still under the impression people don't keep their toothbrushes

_quick hide your cell phone, they'll *totally* try and redistribute it!_

Fuckin shenanigans :l

Kek, well the idea of wealth redistribution is fucking retarded because the second you start buying things for yourself, the idea of having it taken off you "for the greater good" is extremely undesirable.

So you'll get nearly no cooperation from people who don't believe in "the greater good" and want to support their families to give them the best life possible.

Hence why it isn't an option, and hence why it's not literally taking sums of money from one person to give to another person, plus that doesn't solve shit if the money is still allowed to be concentrated back into power centers

There isn't some national tip jar that gets passed around by armed guards

Its things like capital

That get redistributed.

Not things like

But capital in and of itself

So you want to start stealing people's money from them?

You mean in the same way they have money stolen from their labor?

You're gonna start whining about CEOs taking home large pay packets, aren't you?

Or bankers taking home huge amounts of retirement money

Not about large or small pay packets

Its pay at all

The need for a middle man is nonexistent

You want to abolish money

If the resources exist,

And people want to apply their labour to use those resources to make a living, or a good, or what have