Gtfo of your shitty safe-space and fight us like men

Atoms have energy. The energy is the push.

The energy is transfered.

Did they gain energy from some source other than themselves?

They contain energy, not gain it. Just because they contain energy doesn't mean they are the source of it.

@Deleted User where did the energy of atoms come from?

That's an abstraction science struggles with.

It seems priests already know the answer.

That's what their theology tells them. It is just faith. It is not supported by reason.

But it is hard to disprove.

And Aquinas is based on reason.

Marxism is based on matter, not reason.

I don't see how that is possible.

Matter is an abstraction. It's definition is open-ended.

Matter does not need definition.

or abstraction.

Matter exist without abstractions.

>ideology based on matter

>ideology

>based

>on

>matter

That's pretty based yo.

yes

Matter exists is a positive statement. You need to support this claim.

**Brain fucking explodes*

@Anglican ideas are derivative from matter.

Which you can, but not without abstraction.

@Deleted User Statements are also not important.

Or their defense. They are just an abstraction

I think statements are important because without a system of language no thought is possible.

@Deleted User thought is not important for matter.

It is how it is without or with thought.

Oh, it's a spook. I get you now.

Everything not matter (whatever that means) is a spook. Gotcha.

@Deleted User abstractions not based on matter are spooks.

And the one that are based on matter mostly spooks too.

You don't even know what matter is without abstraction.

You pretend that you were born with the knowledge.

You don't know. But that does not matter.

The matter is irrational.