@Deleted User thats from the time you couldn't know atoms moving themselves, right?

>But even the unlearned perceive how ridiculous it is to suppose that instruments are moved, unless they are set in motion by some principal agent.

'Atoms moving themselves'?

Do you really believe in that?

It's an analogy about instruments.

I'll move your ass to hell with my Stuka and my MP40

Prepare for ass-whooping

It's why a 'perpetual motion machine' is impossible.

Do you believe atoms are not moving by themselves?

That doesn't make any sense. Atoms have energy, of course they move.

Kys

@Deleted User They move without a push?

Gtfo of your shitty safe-space and fight us like men

Atoms have energy. The energy is the push.

The energy is transfered.

Did they gain energy from some source other than themselves?

They contain energy, not gain it. Just because they contain energy doesn't mean they are the source of it.

@Deleted User where did the energy of atoms come from?

That's an abstraction science struggles with.

It seems priests already know the answer.

That's what their theology tells them. It is just faith. It is not supported by reason.

But it is hard to disprove.

And Aquinas is based on reason.

Marxism is based on matter, not reason.

I don't see how that is possible.

Matter is an abstraction. It's definition is open-ended.

Matter does not need definition.

or abstraction.

Matter exist without abstractions.

>ideology based on matter

>ideology

>based

>on

>matter

That's pretty based yo.

yes

Matter exists is a positive statement. You need to support this claim.

**Brain fucking explodes*

@Anglican ideas are derivative from matter.

Which you can, but not without abstraction.

@Deleted User Statements are also not important.